Proseal Laryngeal Mask Gel vs I-gel-A Randomised Clinical Trial among Paediatric Patients

被引:0
作者
Uma, B. R. [1 ]
Sridhara [1 ]
机构
[1] JJM Med Coll, Dept Anaesthesia, Davanagere, Karnataka, India
关键词
Airway; Sealing Pressure; Supra glottic airway device; SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY; LMA PROSEAL(TM); I-GEL(TM); CROSSOVER; CHILDREN; CLASSIC(TM); INSERTION; LMA-CLASSIC(TM); LMA-PROSEAL(TM); INTUBATION;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2021/46569.14893
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: A Supraglottic Airway Device (SAD) is placed above the larynx to form a seal around it. SADs like paediatric Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway (P- LMA) and I-geltm are increasingly used in recent times. Aim: To compare the efficacy of paediatric P- LMA and I-gel in clinical practise. Materials and Methods: After obtaining ethical committee clearance and parent/guardian consent, 60 paediatric patients aged 2-12 years belonging to ASA grade I and II posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia, were included in the study. After induction of general anaesthesia, either of the SAD was inserted and study parameters namely ease and number of attempts of insertion of the device, ease of insertion of gastric tube, leak airway pressure, efficacy during positive pressure ventilation and postoperative complications were evaluated. Statistical comparison was performed by repeated measures of variance followed by Unpaired Student t-test and Chi-square test. A probability value p-value less 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Results: The device was easily inserted in 90% of the patients in both study groups (p-value 0.99). In P-LMA group, the device was inserted in first attempt in 83.33% against 90% in the I-gel group (p-value 0.70). In P-LMA group, gastric tube insertion was graded easy in 80% children while in I-gel group it was 90% children (p-value 0.47). The leak airway pressure measured at two different time intervals was statistically insignificant. Intraoperative dislodgement of the device was noted in one child in each group. Postoperative complications like sore throat and dysphagia were reported in four and two children, respectively in P-LMA group, while it was reported in two and one child in the I-gel group. Complications with P-LMA and I-gel were statistically insignificant. Conclusion: Paediatric P-LMA and I-gel are safe and noninvasive methods of securing the airway with regard to clinical safety parameters and hence can be used in paediatric population.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, EUR J ANAESTH
[2]   A cohort evaluation of the paediatric i-gel™ airway during anaesthesia in 120 children [J].
Beringer, R. M. ;
Kelly, F. ;
Cook, T. M. ;
Nolan, J. ;
Hardy, R. ;
Simpson, T. ;
White, M. C. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (12) :1121-1126
[3]  
BRAIN AIJ, 1985, ANAESTHESIA, V40, P356
[4]  
BRIMACOMBE J, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P457
[5]   The ProSea™ laryngeal mask airway:: a review of the literature [J].
Cook, TM ;
Lee, G ;
Nolan, JP .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2005, 52 (07) :739-760
[6]   Comparison of fibreoptic-guided orotracheal intubation through classic and single-use laryngeal mask airways [J].
Danha, RF ;
Thompson, JL ;
Popat, MT ;
Pandit, JJ .
ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 60 (02) :184-188
[7]  
Das Bikramjit, 2012, Anesth Essays Res, V6, P180, DOI 10.4103/0259-1162.108305
[8]  
Dorsch J A., 1984, Understanding Anesthesia Equipment, Construction, Care and Complications, V2 nd, P460
[9]  
Dwivedi Y, 2016, ANAESTH PAIN INTENSI, V20, P176
[10]   The comparison of ProSeal and I-gel laryngeal mask airways in anesthetized adult patients under controlled ventilation [J].
Ekinci, Osman ;
Abitagaoglu, Suheyla ;
Turan, Guldem ;
Sivrikaya, Zubeyir ;
Bosna, Gulsen ;
Ozgultekin, Asu .
SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (04) :432-436