Prospective study of 310 patients: can early CT predict the severity of acute pancreatitis?

被引:21
作者
Knoepfli, A.-S. [1 ]
Kinkel, K.
Berney, T.
Morel, P.
Becker, C. D.
Poletti, P.-A.
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Geneva, Dept Radiol, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Inst Radiol, Clin Grangettes, CH-1224 Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp Geneva, Dept Surg, Clin Visceral & Transplantat Surg, Geneva, Switzerland
来源
ABDOMINAL IMAGING | 2007年 / 32卷 / 01期
关键词
predictive CT criteria; acute pancreatitis outcome;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-006-9034-y
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study was designed to determine the most important early CT parameters predictive of acute pancreatitis severity. Methods: Three hundred and seventy-one consecutive patients with acute abdominal pain and hyperamylasemia were enrolled. Three hundred and ten of the 371 patients met our inclusion criteria. Acute pancreatitis severity was evaluated using the 1992 Atlanta criteria. Different CT parameters were reported from the admission abdominal CT by two radiologists blinded from any clinical parameter, but the patients' age and gender. These variables were fitted in a binary logistic regression model. Results: Acute pancreatitis was mild in 80% cases, severe in 20% cases and lethal in 12.69% cases. The following CT parameters were significantly associated with the severity of acute pancreatitis: the objective size of the pancreas (P = 0.001), the peripancreatic fat abnormalities (P = 0.001) and the extent of necrosis (P = 0.007). Moreover, the age of the patient revealed itself a highly significant (P = 0.001) indicator of disease severity. The association of the four CT criteria eventually showed a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 81% to predict acute pancreatitis severity. Conclusion: Although these criteria correlated with disease severity, our study identified that morphological CT criteria cannot be used to triage patients with severe and mild acute pancreatitis.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 115
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Is the use of specific scoring system still justified in early evaluation of acute pancreatitis? [J].
Anglade, D ;
Létoublon, C ;
Russier, Y ;
Stasia, MJ ;
Lachachi, F ;
Desroche, E ;
Arvieux, C ;
Faucheron, JL .
ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 2000, 125 (04) :325-333
[2]   ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - VALUE OF CT IN ESTABLISHING PROGNOSIS [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
ROBINSON, DL ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
RANSON, JHC .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (02) :331-336
[3]   Acute pancreatitis: Assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation [J].
Balthazar, EJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (03) :603-613
[4]   Staging of acute pancreatitis [J].
Balthazar, EJ .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 40 (06) :1199-+
[5]   IMAGING AND INTERVENTION IN ACUTE-PANCREATITIS [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
FREENY, PC ;
VANSONNENBERG, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (02) :297-306
[6]   Current concepts - Acute necrotizing pancreatitis [J].
Baron, TH ;
Morgan, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (18) :1412-1417
[7]   Natural course of acute pancreatitis [J].
Beger, HG ;
Rau, B ;
Mayer, J ;
Pralle, U .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 21 (02) :130-135
[8]   PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN ACUTE-PANCREATITIS [J].
BLAMEY, SL ;
IMRIE, CW ;
ONEILL, J ;
GILMOUR, WH ;
CARTER, DC .
GUT, 1984, 25 (12) :1340-1346
[9]   IDENTIFICATION OF PANCREAS NECROSIS IN SEVERE ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - IMAGING PROCEDURES VERSUS CLINICAL STAGING [J].
BLOCK, S ;
MAIER, W ;
BITTNER, R ;
BUCHLER, M ;
MALFERTHEINER, P ;
BEGER, HG .
GUT, 1986, 27 (09) :1035-1042
[10]  
BRADLEY EL, 1993, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V128, P586