Microbial fuel cells and osmotic membrane bioreactors have mutual benefits for wastewater treatment and energy production

被引:70
作者
Hou, Dianxun [1 ]
Lu, Lu [1 ]
Ren, Zhiyong Jason [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Forward osmosis; Microbial fuel cell; Thin-film composite membrane; Osmotic membrane bioreactor; RETARDED OSMOSIS EXPERIMENTS; BIOELECTROCHEMICAL SYSTEMS; ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION; PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY; DESALINATION; MECHANISMS; FILTRATION; STRENGTH; CATHODE;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2016.04.017
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study demonstrates that microbial fuel cells (MFCs) and osmotic membrane bioreactors (OMBRs) can be mutually beneficial when integrated together for wastewater treatment. When connecting MFCs with OMBRs, the solute buildup increased conductivity and buffer capacity, which greatly increased MFC power density from 3 W/m(3) up to 11.5 W/m(3). In turn, the MFCs conditioned and reduced sludge production and therefore reduced forward osmosis (FO) membrane fouling. The MFC-OMBR equipped with new thin-film composite (TFC) membrane showed excellent organic (>95%) and phosphorus removal (>99%) and therefore maintained effluent sCOD below 20 mg/L. However, the nitrogen removal was limited due to the negative surface charge of the thin-film composite membrane and solution chemistry, which led to higher flux of ammonium toward the OMBR draw solution. Further studies are needed to improve nitrogen removal, reduce fouling, and optimize system integration. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 189
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Assessment of the Effects of Flow Rate and Ionic Strength on the Performance of an Air-Cathode Microbial Fuel Cell Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
    Aaron, Doug
    Tsouris, Costas
    Hamilton, Choo Y.
    Borole, Abhijeet P.
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2010, 3 (04) : 592 - 606
  • [2] The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes
    Achilli, Andrea
    Cath, Tzahi Y.
    Marchand, Eric A.
    Childress, Amy E.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2009, 239 (1-3) : 10 - 21
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, STANDARD METHODS EXA, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.37-2792
  • [4] Examining sludge production in bioelectrochemical systems treating domestic wastewater
    Brown, Robert Keith
    Harnisch, Falk
    Dockhorn, Thomas
    Schroeder, Uwe
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 198 : 913 - 917
  • [5] Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments
    Cath, Tzahi Y.
    Childress, Amy E.
    Elimelech, Menachem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 281 (1-2) : 70 - 87
  • [6] Performance of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor with forward osmosis membrane for low-strength wastewater treatment
    Chen, Lin
    Gu, Yangshuo
    Cao, Chuqing
    Zhang, Jun
    Ng, Jing-Wen
    Tang, Chuyang
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2014, 50 : 114 - 123
  • [7] Novel Self-driven Microbial Nutrient Recovery Cell with Simultaneous Wastewater Purification
    Chen, Xi
    Sun, Dongya
    Zhang, Xiaoyuan
    Liang, Peng
    Huang, Xia
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [8] Forward osmosis desalination of oil and gas wastewater: Impacts of membrane selection and operating conditions on process performance
    Coday, Bryan D.
    Almaraz, Nohemi
    Cath, Tzahi Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2015, 488 : 40 - 55
  • [9] Effects of Transmembrane Hydraulic Pressure on Performance of Forward Osmosis Membranes
    Coday, Bryan D.
    Heil, Dean M.
    Xu, Pei
    Cath, Tzahi Y.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (05) : 2386 - 2393
  • [10] Devia Y. P., 2015, Journal of Water Resource and Protection, V7, P730, DOI 10.4236/jwarp.2015.79060