Environmental efficiency of transportation sectors in China and Korea

被引:15
作者
Chang, Young-Tae [1 ]
Zhang, Nan [1 ]
机构
[1] Inha Univ, Grad Sch Logist, Inha Rd 100, Incheon, South Korea
关键词
environmental efficiency; transportation sector; slacks-based measure DEA; China; Korea; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; DEA; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1057/mel.2015.28
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
This article analyzes the carbon efficiency of the transportation sectors in China and Korea. It also investigates the effect of environmental regulations on efficiency and the opportunity costs of complying with these regulations. The main methodology employed is the Slacks-Based Measure Data Envelopment Analysis (SBM-DEA). The results show that Korea has improved its environmental efficiency in the transportation sector in recent years and it seems to have been relatively less affected by environmental regulations, whereas China has slightly deteriorated in its environmental efficiency for the same period and it has been relatively more affected by environmental regulations. The average opportunity cost of China's provincial transportation industry, in complying with environmental regulations, tripled from US$590 million in 2004 to $1.8 billion in 2009. The unit loss per ton of Carbon dioxide (CO2) emission doubled from $64 in 2004 to $115 in 2009. In contrast, the average opportunity cost in Korea's provincial transportation industry slightly increased for the same period. Similarly, the unit loss per ton of CO2 emission in Korea increased from $44 in 2004 to $57 in 2007, but then gradually dropped to $48 in 2009. In implementing its visionary low-carbon economy, the Chinese government needs to consider not only ways to improve overall environmental efficiency at a national level, but also the opportunity costs of complying with environmental regulations at a provincial level.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 93
页数:26
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CHINA ENERGY STAT YB
[2]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[3]   MULTILATERAL COMPARISONS OF OUTPUT, INPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY USING SUPERLATIVE INDEX NUMBERS [J].
CAVES, DW ;
CHRISTENSEN, LR ;
DIEWERT, WE .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1982, 92 (365) :73-86
[4]   Evaluating economic and environmental efficiency of global airlines: A SBM-DEA approach [J].
Chang, Young-Tae ;
Park, Hyo-soo ;
Jeong, Jae-beom ;
Lee, Jin-woo .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 27 :46-50
[5]   Environmental efficiency of ports: a Data Envelopment Analysis approach [J].
Chang, Young-Tae .
MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2013, 40 (05) :467-478
[6]   Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach [J].
Chang, Young-Tae ;
Zhang, Ning ;
Danao, Denise ;
Zhang, Nan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 58 :277-283
[7]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[8]   Port performance in Asia: Does production efficiency imply environmental efficiency? [J].
Chin, Anthony T. H. ;
Low, Joyce M. W. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 15 (08) :483-488
[9]  
China Statistics press, 2007, CHINA STAT YB TERTIA
[10]  
Cho C.C., 2010, Q PUBLICATION BANK T, V62, P25