Long-term benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms from a randomized controlled trial

被引:125
作者
Lindholt, J. S. [1 ]
Sorensen, J. [2 ]
Sogaard, R. [2 ]
Henneberg, E. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Viborg Hosp, Vasc Res Unit, DK-8800 Viborg, Denmark
[2] Univ So Denmark, Ctr Appl Hlth Serv Res & Technol Assessment, Odense, Denmark
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MORTALITY; MEN; REPAIR; MASS;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.7001
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim was to estimate long-term mortality benefits and cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men aged 64-73 years. Methods: All men aged 64-73 years living in Viborg County were randomized to be controls (n = 6306) or invited for abdominal ultrasonography at a regional hospital (n = 6333). Mortality and AAA-related interventions were recorded in national databases. The cost of initial screening was based on actual costs of the programme. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated on gains in life years and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY). Discounting (3 per cent) was applied to both costs and effects, and all costs were adjusted to euros at 2007 prices. Results: The relative risk reduction of the screening programme in AAA-related mortality was 66 per cent (hazard ratio 0.34, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.20 to 0.57). The corresponding risk reduction in all-cause mortality was 2 per cent (hazard ratio 0.98, 95 per cent c.i. 0.93 to 1.03). The ICER was estimated at (sic)157 (-3292 to 4401) per life year gained and (sic)179 (-4083 to 4682) per QALY gained. Screening was found to be cost effective at a probability above 0.97 for a willingness-to-pay threshold of only (sic)5000. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that this result was robust to various alternative assumptions, as the probability did not drop below 0.90 for any scenario. Conclusion: The mortality benefit of screening for AAA in men aged 64-73 years was maintained in the longer term and screening was cost effective. Registration number: ISRCTN65822028 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).
引用
收藏
页码:826 / 834
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Ashton H, 2001, J MED SCREEN, V8, P46
[2]  
Ashton HA, 2007, BRIT J SURG, V94, P696, DOI 10.1002/bjs.5780
[3]   The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Ashton, HA ;
Buxton, MJ ;
Day, NE ;
Kim, LG ;
Marteau, TM ;
Scott, RAP ;
Thomspon, SG ;
Walker, NM .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9345) :1531-1539
[4]  
Ashton HA, 2002, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V325, P1135
[5]  
Campbell Helen, 2007, J Health Serv Res Policy, V12, P11, DOI 10.1258/135581907779497594
[6]  
Drummond MF, 2005, Methods for The Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
[7]   Analysis of cost effectiveness of screening Danish men aged 65 for abdominal aortic aneurysm [J].
Ehlers, Lars ;
Overvad, Kim ;
Sorensen, Jan ;
Christensen, Soren ;
Bech, Merete ;
Kjolby, Mette .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 :1542
[8]  
Forbes JF, 1998, LANCET, V352, P1656
[9]   Decision-analytical model with lifetime estimation of costs and health outcomes for one-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in 65-year-old men [J].
Henriksson, M ;
Lundgren, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (08) :976-983
[10]   Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue: a framework for the marriage of health econometrics and cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Hoch, JS ;
Briggs, AH ;
Willan, AR .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 11 (05) :415-430