Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: A comparison of clinical and perioperative outcomes

被引:7
作者
Shishido, Toshihide [1 ,2 ]
Okegawa, Takatsugu [2 ]
Hayashi, Kenjiro [1 ,2 ]
Masuda, Kazuki [2 ]
Taguchi, Satoru [2 ]
Nakamura, Yu [2 ]
Tambo, Mitsuhiro [2 ]
Fukuhara, Hiroshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med Univ, Hachioji Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Tatemachi, Hachioji 1163, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Kyorin Univ Sch Med, Dept Urol, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Laparoscopic surgery; Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection; Testicular tumor; GERM-CELL TUMOR; TESTIS CANCER; LYMPHADENECTOMY; METASTASES; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajur.2021.05.004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the clinical and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) and open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) performed by one surgeon at a single center. Methods: We evaluated 30 patients with stage IIA germ cell tumors who underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (15 underwent L-RPLND and 15 underwent O-RPLND) at our institution between April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2018. The clinical parameters were compared between patients who underwent L-RPLND using the retroperitoneal approach and those who underwent O-RPLND using the transperitoneal approach. There were no significant differences in the background characteristics of the two groups except for the median follow-up duration (46 months for L-RPLND and 71 months for O-RPLND, pZ0.02).Results: L-RPLND was associated with a shorter mean operative time (mean 222 min for LRPLND vs. 453 min for O-RPLND, p<0.001). There was significantly less blood loss during surgery in the L-RPLND group compared to the O-RPLND group (mean 165 mL for L-RPLND vs. 403 mL for O-RPLND, p<0.001). Parameters related to postoperative recovery were significantly better for the L-RPLND group than for the O-RPLND group. There were no differences in the histopathological characteristics between the two groups. No patients in either group exhibited disease recurrence.Conclusion: Patients who underwent L-RPLND had more rapid recovery, and shorter hospital stay compared to those who underwent O-RPLND; complications were comparable between the two groups. L-RPLND is an efficient procedure with the benefits of minimally invasive sur-gery. 2022 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 124
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Laparoscopic and open retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection for clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ-cell testis tumors [J].
Abdel-Aziz, Khaled F. ;
Anderson, J. Kyle ;
Svatek, Robert ;
Margulis, Vitaly ;
Sagalowsky, Arthur I. ;
Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 (09) :627-631
[2]   Extraperitoneal laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection after chemotherapy for nonseminomatous testicular germ-cell tumor: surgical and oncological outcomes [J].
Arai, Yoichi ;
Kaiho, Yasuhiro ;
Yamada, Shigeyuki ;
Saito, Hideo ;
Mitsuzuka, Koji ;
Yamashita, Shinichi ;
Namiki, Shunichi ;
Nakagawa, Haruo ;
Ishidoya, Shigeto ;
Ito, Akihiro .
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 44 (05) :1389-1395
[3]   Postchemotherapy Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Nonseminomatous Germ-Cell Tumor [J].
Calestroupat, Jean-Patrice ;
Sanchez-Salas, Rafael ;
Cathelineau, Xavier ;
Rozet, Francois ;
Galiano, Marc ;
Smyth, Gordon ;
Kasraeian, Ali ;
Barret, Eric ;
Vallancien, Guy .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (04) :645-650
[4]  
Dindo D, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P205, DOI [10.17116/hirurgia2018090162, 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae]
[5]   Risk of systemic metastases in clinical stage I nonseminoma germ cell testis tumor managed by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection [J].
Hermans, BP ;
Sweeney, CJ ;
Foster, RS ;
Einhorn, LE ;
Donohue, JP .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (06) :1721-1724
[6]   Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular tumor: Laparoscopy versus open surgery and impact of learning curve - Editorial comment [J].
Parra, RO .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (01) :94-94
[7]   LAPAROSCOPIC RETROPERITONEAL LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION FOR CLINICAL STAGE-I NONSEMINOMATOUS TESTICULAR-TUMOR [J].
JANETSCHEK, G ;
REISSIGL, A ;
PESCHEL, R ;
HOBISCH, A ;
BARTSCH, G .
UROLOGY, 1994, 44 (03) :382-391
[8]   LAPAROSCOPIC RETROPERITONEAL LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR HIGH-RISK STAGE-1 NONSEMINOMATOUS GERM-CELL TUMOR - REPORT OF 4 CASES [J].
KLOTZ, L .
UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (05) :752-756
[9]   Post-chemotherapy laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection in testis cancer patients [J].
Maldonado-Valadez, Rafael ;
Schilling, David ;
Anastasiadis, Aristotelis G. ;
Sturm, Wolfgang ;
Stenzl, Arnulf ;
Corvin, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (12) :1501-1504
[10]   Post-chemotherapy laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is feasible for stage IIA/B non-seminoma germ cell tumors [J].
Nakamura, Terukazu ;
Kawauchi, Akihiro ;
Oishi, Masakatsu ;
Ueda, Takashi ;
Shiraishi, Takumi ;
Nakanishi, Hiroyuki ;
Kamoi, Kazumi ;
Naya, Yoshio ;
Hongo, Fumiya ;
Okihara, Koji ;
Miki, Tsuneharu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 21 (04) :791-795