Benefits of alternate partial root-zone irrigation on growth, water and nitrogen use efficiencies modified by fertilization and soil water status in maize

被引:95
作者
Li, Fusheng
Liang, Jihua
Kang, Shaozhong [1 ]
Zhang, Jianhua
机构
[1] Guangxi Univ, Coll Agr, Nanning 530005, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Agr, Ctr Agr Water Res China, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Biol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
alternate partial root-zone irrigation (APRI); maize (Zea mays); nitrogen use efficiency; fixed partial root-zone irrigation (FPRI); water use efficiency;
D O I
10.1007/s11104-007-9283-8
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Alternate partial root-zone irrigation (APRI) is a new water-saving technique and may improve crop water use efficiency without much yield reduction. We investigated if the benefits of APRI on biomass accumulation, water and nitrogen use efficiencies could be modified by different soil fertilization and watering levels in pot-grown maize (Zea mays L. cv. super-sweet No 28, a local variety). Three irrigation methods, i.e. conventional irrigation (CI), alternate partial root-zone irrigation (APRI, alternate watering on both sides of the pot) and fixed partial root-zone irrigation (FPRI, fixed watering on one side of the pot), two watering levels, i.e. water deficit (W-1, 45-55% of field capacity) and well-watered (W-2, 70-80% of field capacity), and two N fertilization levels, i.e. no fertilization and fertilization, were designed. Results showed that APRI and FPRI methods led to more reduction in transpiration than in photosynthesis, and thus increased leaf water use efficiency (leaf WUE, i.e. the ratio of leaf net photosynthetic rate to transpiration rate). Compared to the CI treatment, APRI and FPRI increased leaf WUE by 7.7% and 8.1% before the jointing stage and 3.6% and 4.2% during the jointing stage, respectively. Under the fertilization and well-watered conditions, APRI treatment saved irrigation water by 38.4% and reduced shoot and total dry masses by 5.9% and 6.7%, respectively if compared to the CI treatment. APRI also enhanced canopy WUE (defined as the amount of total biomass per unit water used) and nitrogen (N) apparent recovery fraction (Nr, defined as the ratio of the increased N uptake to N applied) by 24.3% and 16.4%, respectively, indicating that effect of APRI can be better materialized under appropriate fertilization and water supply.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 291
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
DAVIES WJ, 1991, ANNU REV PLANT PHYS, V42, P55, DOI 10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.000415
[2]  
Du JJ, 1999, J NW AGR U, V27, P1
[3]   Yield and physiological responses of cotton to partial root-zone irrigation in the oasis field of northwest China [J].
Du, Taisheng ;
Kang, Shaozhong ;
Zhang, Jianhua ;
Li, Fusheng ;
Hu, Xiaotao .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2006, 84 (1-2) :41-52
[4]  
Duan AW., 1999, CROP J, V25, P766
[5]  
GONG D, 2004, J HYDRAULIC ENG, V10, P120
[6]  
GU SL, 2000, 000702 CAL STAT U CA
[7]  
Han YanLi, 2002, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, V18, P57
[8]  
Huang C., 2004, WATER SAVING IRRIGAT, V6, P8, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1007-4929.2004.06.003
[9]  
Jones H. G., 1992, Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology.
[10]  
Kang S., 1997, Agric. Res. Arid. Areas, V15, P1