The Development and Validation of the Speech Quality Instrument

被引:1
作者
Chen, Stephanie Y. [1 ]
Griffin, Brianna M. [1 ]
Mancuso, Dean [2 ]
Shiau, Stephanie [3 ]
DiMattia, Michelle [4 ]
Cellum, Ilana [2 ]
Boyd, Kelly Harvey [4 ]
Prevoteau, Charlotte [5 ]
Kohlberg, Gavriel D. [2 ]
Spitzer, Jaclyn B. [2 ]
Lalwani, Anil K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Div Otol Neurotol & Skull Base Surg, 180 Ft Washington Ave,Harkness Pavil HP818, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Cochlear Implant Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, New York, NY USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Voice & Swallowing Inst, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Hosp Rouen, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Rouen, France
关键词
Speech perception; speech quality; validated tool; COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERS; MUSIC PERCEPTION; SCALE; APPRAISAL;
D O I
10.1002/lary.27041
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: Although speech perception tests are available to evaluate hearing, there is no standardized validated tool to quantify speech quality. The objective of this study is to develop a validated tool to measure quality of speech heard. Study Design: Prospective instrument validation study of 35 normal hearing adults recruited at a tertiary referral center. Methods: Participants listened to 44 speech clips of male/female voices reciting the Rainbow Passage. Speech clips included original and manipulated excerpts capturing goal qualities such as mechanical and garbled. Listeners rated clips on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) of 18 characteristics (e.g. cartoonish, garbled). Results: Skewed distribution analysis identified mean ratings in the upper and lower 2-point limits of the VAS (ratings of 8-10, 0-2, respectively); items with inconsistent responses were eliminated. The test was pruned to a final instrument of nine speech clips that clearly define qualities of interest: speech-like, male/female, cartoonish, echo-y, garbled, tinny, mechanical, rough, breathy, soothing, hoarse, like, pleasant, natural. Mean ratings were highest for original female clips (8.8) and lowest for not-speech manipulation (2.1). Factor analysis identified two subsets of characteristics: internal consistency demonstrated Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 and 0.82 per subset. Test-retest reliability of total scores was high, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.76. Conclusion: The Speech Quality Instrument (SQI) is a concise, valid tool for assessing speech quality as an indicator for hearing performance. SQI may be a valuable outcome measure for cochlear implant recipients who, despite achieving excellent speech perception, often experience poor speech quality.
引用
收藏
页码:1622 / 1627
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SKINDER MEREDITH SPE
[3]   Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users [J].
Drennan, Ward R. ;
Oleson, Jacob J. ;
Gfeller, Kate ;
Crosson, Jillian ;
Driscoll, Virginia D. ;
Won, Jong Ho ;
Anderson, Elizabeth S. ;
Rubinstein, Jay T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 54 (02) :114-123
[4]   The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) [J].
Gatehouse, S ;
Noble, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (02) :85-99
[5]   Does Cochlear Implantation Restore Music Appreciation? [J].
Kohlberg, Gavriel ;
Spitzer, Jaclyn B. ;
Mancuso, Dean ;
Lalwani, Anil K. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (03) :587-588
[6]  
Kondo K., 2012, Subjective quality measurement of speech its evaluation, estimation and applications
[7]   A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research [J].
Koo, Terry K. ;
Li, Mae Y. .
JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE, 2016, 15 (02) :155-163
[8]  
Loizou PC, 2011, STUD COMPUT INTELL, V346, P623
[9]   ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research [J].
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Wyrwich, Kathleen W. ;
Wu, Albert W. ;
Velikova, Galina ;
Terwee, Caroline B. ;
Snyder, Claire F. ;
Schwartz, Carolyn ;
Revicki, Dennis A. ;
Moinpour, Carol M. ;
McLeod, Lori D. ;
Lyons, Jessica C. ;
Lenderking, William R. ;
Hinds, Pamela S. ;
Hays, Ron D. ;
Greenhalgh, Joanne ;
Gershon, Richard ;
Feeny, David ;
Fayers, Peter M. ;
Cella, David ;
Brundage, Michael ;
Ahmed, Sara ;
Aaronson, Neil K. ;
Butt, Zeeshan .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (08) :1889-1905
[10]   Development and Validation of the AzBio Sentence Lists [J].
Spahr, Anthony J. ;
Dorman, Michael F. ;
Litvak, Leonid M. ;
Van Wie, Susan ;
Gifford, Rene H. ;
Loizou, Philipos C. ;
Loiselle, Louise M. ;
Oakes, Tyler ;
Cook, Sarah .
EAR AND HEARING, 2012, 33 (01) :112-117