Cost-effectiveness analysis of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in an Iranian high-risk population

被引:12
作者
Esmaeili, Mansur Haji [1 ]
Seyednejad, Farshad [2 ]
Mahboub-Ahari, Alireza [1 ]
Ameri, Hossein [3 ]
Abdollahzad, Hadi [4 ]
Safaei, Naser [5 ]
Alinezhad, Farbod [6 ]
Yousefi, Mahmood [1 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Sch Management & Med Informat, Dept Hlth Econ, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Madani Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tabriz, Iran
[3] Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Hlth Policy & Management Res Ctr, Yazd, Iran
[4] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Res Ctr Environm Determinants Hlth, Kermanshah, Iran
[5] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Madani Heart Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
[6] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Students Res Comm, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; low dose computed tomography; lung cancer; OVERDIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1177/09691413211018253
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective The results of recent studies have shown that using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for screening of lung cancer (LC) improves cancer outcomes. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of LDCT in an Iranian high-risk population. Methods A Markov cohort simulation model with four health states was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of LDCT from a healthcare system perspective in the people aged 55-74 who smoked 25 or more cigarettes per day for 10-30 years. Cost data were collected, reviewing 324 medical records of patients with LC, and utilities and transition probabilities were extracted from the literature. The Monte Carlo simulation method was applied to run the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis and one-way analysis were also performed. Results LC screening in comparison to a no-screening strategy was costly and effective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of screening versus no-screening was IRR (Iranian rials) 98,515,014.04 which falls below the Iranian threshold of three times GDP (gross domestic product) per capita. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the results of the economic analysis were robust to variations in the key inputs for both. Conclusions Using LDCT for screening of LC patients in a high-risk population is a cost-effective strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 501
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Ameri Hosein, 2020, Med J Islam Repub Iran, V34, P121, DOI 10.34171/mjiri.34.121
[2]   Trends in lung cancer risk and screening eligibility affect overdiagnosis estimates [J].
Blom, Erik F. ;
ten Haaf, Kevin ;
de Koning, Harry J. .
LUNG CANCER, 2020, 139 :200-206
[3]   Overdiagnosis of lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography screening: meta-analysis of the randomised clinical trials [J].
Brodersen, John ;
Voss, Theis ;
Martiny, Frederik ;
Siersma, Volkert ;
Barratt, Alexandra ;
Heleno, Bruno .
BREATHE, 2020, 16 (01)
[4]   The Cost-Effectiveness of High-Risk Lung Cancer Screening and Drivers of Program Efficiency [J].
Cressman, Sonya ;
Peacock, Stuart J. ;
Tammemagi, Martin C. ;
Evans, William K. ;
Leighl, Natasha B. ;
Goffin, John R. ;
Tremblay, Alain ;
Liu, Geoffrey ;
Manos, Darla ;
MacEachern, Paul ;
Bhatia, Rick ;
Puksa, Serge ;
Nicholas, Garth ;
McWilliams, Annette ;
Mayo, John R. ;
Yee, John ;
English, John C. ;
Pataky, Reka ;
McPherson, Emily ;
Atkar-Khattra, Sukhinder ;
Johnston, Michael R. ;
Schmidt, Heidi ;
Shepherd, Frances A. ;
Soghrati, Kam ;
Amjadi, Kayvan ;
Burrowes, Paul ;
Couture, Christian ;
Sekhon, Harmanjatinder S. ;
Yasufuku, Kazuhiro ;
Goss, Glenwood ;
Ionescu, Diana N. ;
Hwang, David M. ;
Martel, Simon ;
Sin, Don D. ;
Tan, Wan C. ;
Urbanski, Stefan ;
Xu, Zhaolin ;
Tsao, Ming-Sound ;
Lam, Stephen .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (08) :1210-1222
[5]   This Week in the Journal [J].
de Koning, H. J. ;
van der Aalst, C. M. ;
de Jong, P. A. ;
Scholten, E. T. ;
Nackaerts, K. ;
Heuvelmans, M. A. ;
Lammers, J. -W. J. ;
Weenink, C. ;
Yousaf-Khan, U. ;
Horeweg, N. ;
van't Westeinde, S. ;
Prokop, M. ;
Mali, W. P. ;
Hoesein, F. A. A. Mohamed ;
van Ooijen, P. M. A. ;
Aerts, J. G. J. V. ;
den Bakker, M. A. ;
Thunnissen, E. ;
Verschakelen, J. ;
Vliegenthart, R. ;
Walter, J. E. ;
ten Haaf, K. ;
Groen, H. J. M. ;
Oudkerk, M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (06) :503-513
[6]   Implementing low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Canada: implications of alternative at-risk populations, screening frequency, and duration [J].
Evans, W. K. ;
Flanagan, W. M. ;
Miller, A. B. ;
Goffin, J. R. ;
Memon, S. ;
Fitzgerald, N. ;
Wolfson, M. C. .
CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (03) :E179-E187
[7]   Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Costs, National Expenditures, and Cost-Effectiveness [J].
Goulart, Bernardo H. L. ;
Bensink, Mark E. ;
Mummy, David G. ;
Ramsey, Scott D. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2012, 10 (02) :267-275
[8]   Cost-effectiveness analysis of lung cancer screening with low-dose computerised tomography of the chest in Poland [J].
Kanarkiewicz, Malgorzata ;
Szczesny, Tomasz J. ;
Krysinski, Jerzy ;
Bucinski, Adam ;
Kowalewski, Janusz ;
Pawlowicz, Zbigniew .
WSPOLCZESNA ONKOLOGIA-CONTEMPORARY ONCOLOGY, 2015, 19 (06) :480-486
[9]  
Ksiaek J., 2009, ANN ACAD MED GEDAN, V39, P73
[10]   Lung, cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers - A decision and cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Mahadevia, PJ ;
Fleisher, LA ;
Fric, KD ;
Eng, J ;
Goodman, SN ;
Powe, NR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (03) :313-322