EVALUATION OF THE LUMBAR KINEMATIC MEASURES THAT MOST CONSISTENTLY CHARACTERIZE LUMBAR MUSCLE ACTIVATION PATTERNS DURING TRUNK FLEXION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

被引:2
|
作者
Luehring, Sebastian [1 ]
Schinkel-Ivy, Alison [2 ]
Drake, Janessa D. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] York Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Biomechanics; Kinematics; Low Back Pain; Electromyography; Spine; ERECTOR SPINAE MUSCLES; LOW-BACK MUSCULATURE; RELAXATION PHENOMENON; HIP; MOVEMENTS; EXTENSION; POSTURE; SILENCE; TISSUES; LOADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.10.011
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine which kinematic measure most consistently determined onset and cessation of the flexion-relaxation response. Methods: The study was a cross-sectional design in a laboratory setting in which 20 asymptomatic university-aged (19.8-33.3 years old) participants were tested. Muscle activation was measured for the lumbar erector spinae, and 3-dimensional motion was recorded. Flexion-relaxation onset and cessation occurrences were determined for 10 standing maximum voluntary flexion trials. The lumbar and trunk angles at both events were expressed as unnormalized (degrees) and normalized (%Max: percentage of maximum voluntary flexion) measures. Intraclass correlation coefficients and coefficients of variation were calculated to determine within-and between-participant reliability, respectively. Results: Mean (SD) unnormalized flexion-relaxation angles ranged from 46.28 degrees (11.63) (lumbar onset) to 108.10 degrees (12.26) (trunk cessation), whereas normalized angles ranged from 71.31%Max (16.44) (trunk onset) to 94.83%Max (lumbar cessation). Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.905 (normalized lumbar, left side, onset) to 0.995 (unnormalized lumbar, both sides, cessation). Coefficients of variation ranged from 3.56% (normalized lumbar, right side, cessation) to 26.02% (unnormalized trunk, left side, onset). Conclusions: The data suggest that, for asymptomatic individuals, unnormalized and normalized lumbar kinematics most consistently characterized flexion-relaxation angles within and between participants, respectively. Lumbar measures may be preferential when the flexion-relaxation response is investigated in future clinical and biomechanical studies.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 50
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Differences in lumbar spine and lower extremity kinematics in people with and without low back pain during a step-up task: a cross-sectional study
    Mitchell, Katie
    Porter, Madeline
    Anderson, Lauren
    Phillips, Carter
    Arceo, Grayson
    Montz, Brian
    Levy, Susan
    Gombatto, Sara P.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2017, 18
  • [22] Lumbar and Cervical Concurrent Muscle Activity Analysis During Hamstring Length Testing to Design a Customized Treatment Plan: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study
    Supriya, S.
    Patil, Shantanu
    Bagavandas, M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [23] Kinematic analysis of sensorimotor control during the craniocervical flexion movement in patients with neck pain and asymptomatic individuals: a cross-sectional study
    Elena Bocos-Corredor
    Filippo Moggioli
    Tomás Pérez-Fernández
    Susan Armijo-Olivo
    Cristina Sánchez
    Juan Nicolás Cuenca-Zaldívar
    Josué Fernández-Carnero
    Aitor Martín-Pintado-Zugasti
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 20
  • [24] Muscle Activation During Pilates Exercises in Participants With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study
    Bastos de Oliveira, Naiane Teixeira
    Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas, Sandra Maria
    Fuhro, Fernanda Ferreira
    da Luz, Mauricio Antonio, Jr.
    Amorim, Cesar Ferreira
    Nunes Cabral, Cristina Maria
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 98 (01): : 88 - 95
  • [25] Obstacle Crossing During Gait in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Cross-Sectional Study With Kinematic Analysis of Dynamic Balance and Trunk Control
    Malone, Ailish
    Kiernan, Damien
    French, Helen
    Saunders, Valerie
    O'Brien, Timothy
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2016, 96 (08): : 1208 - 1215
  • [26] Association between abdominal muscle activity and lumbar muscle morphology, and their role in the functional assessment of patients with low back pain: A cross-sectional study
    Polat, Musa
    Demirsoy, Nesrin
    Tokgoz, Nil
    JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL & NEURONAL INTERACTIONS, 2022, 22 (03) : 375 - 384
  • [27] The Relationship of Transversus Abdominis and Lumbar Multifidus Activation and Prognostic Factors for Clinical Success With a Stabilization Exercise Program: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Hebert, Jeffrey J.
    Koppenhaver, Shane L.
    Magel, John S.
    Fritz, Julie M.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 91 (01): : 78 - 85
  • [28] Assessment of lumbar paraspinal muscle morphology using mDixon Quant magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a cross-sectional study in healthy subjects
    Krkoska, Peter
    Kokosova, Viktoria
    Dostal, Marek
    Vlazna, Daniela
    Kerkovsky, Milos
    Straka, Matej
    Gerstberger, Radim
    Matulova, Katerina
    Ovesna, Petra
    Adamova, Blanka
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 14 (08) : 6015 - 6035
  • [29] Increased intramuscular fatty infiltration without differences in lumbar muscle cross-sectional area during remission of unilateral recurrent low back pain
    D'hooge, Roseline
    Cagnie, Barbara
    Crombez, Geert
    Vanderstraeten, Guy
    Dolphens, Mieke
    Danneels, Lieven
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2012, 17 (06) : 584 - 588
  • [30] Differences in lumbar spine and lower extremity kinematics in people with and without low back pain during a step-up task: a cross-sectional study
    Katie Mitchell
    Madeline Porter
    Lauren Anderson
    Carter Phillips
    Grayson Arceo
    Brian Montz
    Susan Levy
    Sara P. Gombatto
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18