Is there a definition of remission in late-life depression that predicts later relapse?

被引:13
作者
Taylor, WD [1 ]
McQuoid, DR [1 ]
Steffens, DC [1 ]
Krishnan, KRR [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
depression; geriatrics; outcomes; rating scale;
D O I
10.1038/sj.npp.1300549
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Remission of depressive symptoms is the goal of all antidepressant therapy. Rating scales define remission in clinical trials, but it is unclear how well these definitions predict risk of later relapse. We measured the sensitivity and specificity of a range of Montgomery - Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) cutoff scores at 3- and 6-months, wherein scores above a given cutoff would predict relapse over an 18-month period. We examined 153 elderly depressed subjects exhibiting a MADRS less than or equal to15 after 3 or 6 months of antidepressant therapy. Subjects who subsequently exhibited a MADRS >15 during the 18-month study period were defined as relapsed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were developed and area under the curve (AUC) values calculated for the sensitivity and specificity of 3- and 6-month MADRS scores to predict future relapse. The 3- month ROC had an AUC value of 0.63; the 6-month ROC had an AUC value of 0.66. There was no MADRS cutoff found that could predict likelihood of relapse with good sensitivity and specificity. A post hoc analysis where relapse rate was adjusted by controlling for medical comorbidity, disability, and social support showed no change in the ROCs or AUC values. The higher the MADRS score at 3 and 6 months, the greater the likelihood of relapse. With no clean MADRS cutoff score, the goal of antidepressant therapy should be the lowest possible degree of depressive symptomatology to minimize risk of later relapse. Definitions of remission that are better associated with longer-term outcomes are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:2272 / 2277
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Executive dysfunction and long-term outcomes of geriatric depression
    Alexopoulos, GS
    Meyers, BS
    Young, RC
    Kalayam, B
    Kakuma, T
    Gabrielle, M
    Sirey, JA
    Hull, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 57 (03) : 285 - 290
  • [2] Ballenger JC, 1999, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V60, P29
  • [3] Psychosocial and clinical predictors of unipolar depression outcome in older adults
    Bosworth, HB
    Hays, JC
    George, LK
    Steffens, DC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 17 (03) : 238 - 246
  • [4] MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN
    FOLSTEIN, MF
    FOLSTEIN, SE
    MCHUGH, PR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) : 189 - 198
  • [5] CONCEPTUALIZATION AND RATIONALE FOR CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS OF TERMS IN MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER - REMISSION, RECOVERY, RELAPSE, AND RECURRENCE
    FRANK, E
    PRIEN, RF
    JARRETT, RB
    KELLER, MB
    KUPFER, DJ
    LAVORI, PW
    RUSH, AJ
    WEISSMAN, MM
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1991, 48 (09) : 851 - 855
  • [6] SOCIAL SUPPORT AND THE OUTCOME OF MAJOR DEPRESSION
    GEORGE, LK
    BLAZER, DG
    HUGHES, DC
    FOWLER, N
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 154 : 478 - 485
  • [7] Guy W., 1976, ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, V76, P217
  • [8] A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION
    HAMILTON, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1960, 23 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [9] Defining remission by cut off score on the MADRS: selecting the optimal value
    Hawley, CJ
    Gale, TM
    Sivakumaran, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2002, 72 (02) : 177 - 184
  • [10] HORWATH E, 1992, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V49, P817