Analysis of randomised trials with long-term follow-up

被引:52
作者
Herbert, Robert D. [1 ,2 ]
Kasza, Jessica [3 ]
Bo, Kari [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Neurosci Res Australia NeuRA, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Norwegian Sch Sport Sci, Oslo, Norway
[5] Akershus Univ Hosp, Lorenskog, Norway
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Clinical trials; Randomized controlled trials; Long-term follow-up; Non-compliance; Treatment switching; Co-intervention; Loss to follow-up; LONGITUDINAL DATA; CAUSAL; TRUNCATION; INTENTION; TREAT;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-018-0499-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Randomised trials with long-term follow-up can provide estimates of the long-term effects of health interventions. However, analysis of long-term outcomes in randomised trials may be complicated by problems with the administration of treatment such as non-adherence, treatment switching and co-intervention, and problems obtaining outcome measurements arising from loss to follow-up and death of participants. Methods for dealing with these issues that involve conditioning on post-randomisation variables are unsatisfactory because they may involve the comparison of non-exchangeable groups and generate estimates that do not have a valid causal interpretation. We describe approaches to analysis that potentially provide estimates of causal effects when such issues arise. Brief descriptions are provided of the use of instrumental variable and propensity score methods in trials with imperfect adherence, marginal structural models and g-estimation in trials with treatment switching, mixed longitudinal models and multiple imputation in trials with loss to follow-up, and a sensitivity analysis that can be used when trial follow-up is truncated by death or other events. Clinical trialists might consider these methods both at the design and analysis stages of randomised trials with long-term follow-up.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Does Cox analysis of a randomized survival study yield a causal treatment effect? [J].
Aalen, Odd O. ;
Cook, Richard J. ;
Roysland, Kjetil .
LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS, 2015, 21 (04) :579-593
[2]  
Albert PS, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P1707, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990715)18:13<1707::AID-SIM138>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-H
[4]  
Angrist J., 2005, 314 NAT BUR EC RES
[5]  
Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
[6]   2-STAGE LEAST-SQUARES ESTIMATION OF AVERAGE CAUSAL EFFECTS IN MODELS WITH VARIABLE TREATMENT INTENSITY [J].
ANGRIST, JD ;
IMBENS, GW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 90 (430) :431-442
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PREV TREATM MISS DAT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, EXPLANATION CAUSAL I
[9]   Lower urinary tract symptoms and pelvic floor muscle exercise adherence after 15 years [J].
Bo, K ;
Kvarstein, B ;
Nygaard, I .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (05) :999-1005
[10]   A Simple Method for Principal Strata Effects When the Outcome Has Been Truncated Due to Death [J].
Chiba, Yasutaka ;
VanderWeele, Tyler J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 173 (07) :745-751