A Robust and Reliable Test to Measure Stereopsis in the Clinic

被引:25
|
作者
Hess, Robert F. [1 ]
Ding, Rifeng [1 ]
Clavagnier, Simon [1 ]
Liu, Catherine [1 ]
Guo, Cindy [2 ]
Viner, Catherine [3 ]
Barrett, Brendan T. [3 ]
Radia, Krupali [3 ]
Zhou, Jiawei [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, McGill Vis Res, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[2] Univ Auckland, Dept Vis Sci & Optometry, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[3] Univ Bradford, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Bradford BD7 1DP, W Yorkshire, England
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
clinic; stereoacuity; iPod; BINOCULAR IPAD TREATMENT; AMBLYOPIA; STEREOACUITY; SENSITIVITY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1167/iovs.15-18690
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to develop a convenient test of stereopsis in the clinic that is both robust and reliable and capable of providing a measure of variability necessary to make valid comparisons between measurements obtained at different occasions or under different conditions. METHODS. Stereo acuity was measured based on principles derived from the laboratory measurement of stereopsis (i.e., staircase method). Potential premeasurement compensations are described if there is a significant degree of ocular misalignment, reduced visual acuity, or aniseikonia. Forty-six adults at McGill University, 44 adults at Auckland University, and 51 adults from the University of Bradford, with an age range of 20 to 65 years old and normal or corrected-to-normal vision participated in this study. RESULTS. Stereo acuity within this normal population was widely distributed, with a significant percentage (28%) of the population with only coarse stereo (>300 arc seconds). Across subjects, the SD was approximately 25% of the mean. Measurements at two different times were strongly (r = 0.79) and significantly (P < 0.001) correlated, with little to no significant (P = 0.79) bias (0.01) between test and retest measures of stereopsis. CONCLUSIONS. The application enables measurements over the wide disparity range and not just at the finest disparities. In addition, it allows changes in stereopsis of the order of 1.9 to be statistically distinguished.
引用
收藏
页码:798 / 804
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A novel dynamic random-dot stereopsis assessment to measure stereopsis in intermittent exotropia
    Zhong, Jing
    Deng, Daming
    Chen, Zidong
    Li, Jinrong
    Yuan, Junpeng
    Feng, Lei
    Yu, Minbin
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [2] STEREOLATENCY - A STEREOPSIS TEST FOR EVERYDAY DEPTH-PERCEPTION
    LARSON, WL
    FAUBERT, J
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1992, 69 (12) : 926 - 930
  • [3] Horizontal Lang two-pencil test as a screening test for stereopsis and binocularity
    Nongpiur, Monisha E.
    Sharma, Pradeep
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 58 (04) : 287 - 290
  • [4] Comparison of a New, Filter-Free Stereopsis Test (BEST) With the Randot Stereotest in a Pediatric Cohort
    Lagstein, Oded
    Hecht, Idan
    Anteby, Irene
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY & STRABISMUS, 2020, 57 (02) : 129 - 135
  • [5] Random Dot E Stereotest underestimates stereopsis at high test distances
    Zhao, Lingzhi
    Wu, Huang
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2020, 103 (06) : 918 - 919
  • [6] Real Stereopsis Test Using a Three-Dimensional Display with Tridef Software
    Han, Jinu
    Han, So Young
    Lee, Seung Koo
    Lee, Jong Bok
    Han, Sueng-Han
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 55 (06) : 1672 - 1677
  • [7] A reliable measure of frailty for a community dwelling older population
    Kamaruzzaman, Shahrul
    Ploubidis, George B.
    Fletcher, Astrid
    Ebrahim, Shah
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2010, 8
  • [8] A Convenient and Robust Test to Quantify Interocular Suppression for Children With Amblyopia
    Chen, Hui
    He, Zhifen
    Xu, Jinling
    Mao, Yu
    Liang, Yunjie
    Lin, Danli
    Xu, Meiping
    Dai, Zhiyue
    Chen, Xiaoxin
    Zhou, Jiawei
    Yu, Xinping
    I-PERCEPTION, 2019, 10 (04):
  • [9] Vitamin D Level Testing in an Urban Midwest Clinic: To Test or Not to Test?
    Mundt, Daniel
    Klumph, Marianne
    Heslin, Kayla
    Askar, Wajih
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-CENTERED RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2022, 9 (02) : 122 - 127
  • [10] How should we measure social disadvantage in clinic settings?
    Foreman, DM
    Foreman, D
    Minty, EB
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 12 (06) : 308 - 312