Sustainability tradeoffs in the adoption of 3D Concrete Printing in the construction industry

被引:63
作者
Adaloudis, Max [1 ]
Roca, Jaime Bonnin [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Innovat Sci, POB 513, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
Additive manufacturing; 3D printing; Construction; Concrete; Sustainability; Technology adoption; GREEN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT; CIRCULAR ECONOMY; INNOVATION; CHALLENGES; LABOR; EXPERIENCES; SELECTION; DESIGN; CEMENT; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127201
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, 3D Concrete Printing (3DCP) has gained traction as a technological solution for reducing cement production's hefty carbon footprint. Studies assessing the sustainability benefits of 3DCP have not included its impact on social sustainability, nor how construction firms' implementation of this new technology has affected its success. This study applies grounded theory methods to analyze the tradeoffs between environmental, economic, and social sustainability, and how firms' decisions impact these tradeoffs. We gather insights from 20 interviews with 3DCP pioneers in Central and Northern Europe. Our findings suggest that firms' greatest incentive to invest in the technology is not related to the environmental benefits, but rather 3DCP's potential to increase automation and combat the current shortage of skilled labor in the construction sector. Current government procurement rules do not reward sustainability benefits sufficiently to encourage the uptake of 3DCP. Based on our findings, we identify five strategic decisions that companies make which affect 3DCP's sustainability, and discuss opportunities for government to foster the adoption of this technology.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Potential benefits of digital fabrication for complex structures: Envitonmental assessment of a robotically fabricated concrete-wall [J].
Agusti-Juan, Isolda ;
Muller, Florian ;
Hack, Norman ;
Wangler, Timothy ;
Habert, Guillaume .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 154 :330-340
[2]   Comparison of Worker Safety Risks between Onsite and Offsite Construction Methods: A Site Management Perspective [J].
Ahn, Seungjun ;
Crouch, Luke ;
Kim, Tae Wan ;
Rameezdeen, Raufdeen .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 146 (09)
[3]   Posting and agency work in British construction and hospitality: the role of regulation in differentiating the experiences of migrants [J].
Alberti, Gabriella ;
Danaj, Sonila .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 28 (21) :3065-3088
[4]   Insights into material design, extrusion rheology, and properties of 3D-printable alkali-activated fly ash-based binders [J].
Alghamdi, Hussam ;
Nair, Sooraj A. O. ;
Neithalath, Narayanan .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2019, 167
[5]   Environmental assessment of large-scale 3D printing in construction: A comparative study between cob and concrete [J].
Alhumayani, Hashem ;
Gomaa, Mohamed ;
Soebarto, Veronica ;
Jabi, Wassim .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 270
[6]  
[Anonymous], DEV TRAINING ED, P211, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-76084-1_14, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-76084-1_14]
[7]   LEARNING-CURVES IN MANUFACTURING [J].
ARGOTE, L ;
EPPLE, D .
SCIENCE, 1990, 247 (4945) :920-924
[8]   The Importance of Regulation-Induced Innovation for Sustainable Development [J].
Ashford, Nicholas A. ;
Hall, Ralph P. .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (01) :270-292
[9]  
Assuncao E., 2019, ADDITIVE MANUFACTURI
[10]   'Legitimation' and 'development of positive externalities':: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Jacobsson, Staffan ;
Sanden, Bjorn A. .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2008, 20 (05) :575-592