DEBT FINANCING AND TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA

被引:29
作者
Xin, Kuang [1 ]
Sun, Yuchun [1 ]
Zhang, Ran [2 ]
Liu, Xiao [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat & Informat Management, Urumqi, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Engn Sci, Sch Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
debt financing; radical innovation; incremental innovation; R&D; negative binomial regression; China; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FIRM AGE; COLLABORATION NETWORKS; CAPITAL STRUCTURE; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; GROWTH; BANKS; KNOWLEDGE; DEREGULATION;
D O I
10.3846/jbem.2019.10185
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The availabilities of debt for Chinese firms have been increased since 2008 due to the expansionary monetary policies. These policies triggered concerns over the impact of debt financing on firms' technological innovation activities. Based on a sample of 225 listed computer and telecommunications equipment firms in China within 2008-2015, this study explored the effect of debt financing on two types of technological innovation, namely radical and incremental innovation. Specifically, both the direct effect of debt financing on technological innovation and its moderating effect on the relationship between R&D intensity and technological innovation were investigated. Results of this study reveal that radical innovation decreases with debt financing at decreasing rates, while incremental innovation is not affected by debt financing itself. In addition, debt financing interacted with R&D intensity exerts positive effect on both radical and incremental innovation. This study adds meaningful insights to the literature on financing technological innovation and builds a bridge connecting macroeconomic policies to firm activities.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 859
页数:19
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Bankruptcy Codes and Innovation [J].
Acharya, Viral V. ;
Subramanian, Krishnamurthy V. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2009, 22 (12) :4949-4988
[2]   Hold-up and the use of performance-sensitive debt [J].
Adam, Tim R. ;
Streitz, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 2016, 26 :47-67
[3]   Innovation and Institutional Ownership [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Van Reenen, John ;
Zingales, Luigi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :277-304
[4]   Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G ;
Katila, R .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (03) :197-220
[5]   Bank size or distance: what hampers innovation adoption by SMEs? [J].
Alessandrini, Pietro ;
Presbiteroy, Andrea F. ;
Zazzaroz, Alberto .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 10 (06) :845-881
[6]   The determinants of firm-bank relationships in Italy: bank ownership type, diversification and multiple banking relationships [J].
Aristei, David ;
Gallo, Manuela .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2017, 23 (15) :1512-1543
[7]   Access to banks and external capital acquisition: perceived innovation obstacles [J].
Backman, Mikaela ;
Wallin, Tina .
ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2018, 61 (01) :161-187
[8]   Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit? [J].
Beck, Mathias ;
Lopes-Bento, Cindy ;
Schenker-Wicki, Andrea .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (04) :869-883
[9]   Banks and innovation: Microeconometric evidence on Italian firms [J].
Benfratello, Luigi ;
Schiantarelli, Fabio ;
Sembenelli, Alessandro .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 90 (02) :197-217
[10]   SHORT-TERM VERSUS LONG-TERM INTERESTS - CAPITAL STRUCTURE WITH MULTIPLE INVESTORS [J].
BERGLOF, E ;
VONTHADDEN, EL .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (04) :1055-1084