Bowtie Methodology for Risk Analysis of Visual Borescope Inspection during Aircraft Engine Maintenance

被引:16
作者
Aust, Jonas [1 ]
Pons, Dirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Mech Engn, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand
关键词
aviation maintenance; borescope inspection; Bowtie analysis; maintenance; repair; and overhaul (MRO); risk assessment; risk management; visual inspection; ARAMIS PROJECT; TIE DIAGRAMS; MANAGEMENT; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.3390/aerospace6100110
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Background-The inspection of aircraft parts is critical, as a defective part has many potentially adverse consequences. Faulty parts can initiate a system failure on an aircraft, which can lead to aircraft mishap if not well managed and has the potential to cause fatalities and serious injuries of passengers and crew. Hence, there is value in better understanding the risks in visual inspection during aircraft maintenance. Purpose-This paper identifies the risks inherent in visual inspection tasks during aircraft engine maintenance and how it differs from aircraft operations. Method-A Bowtie analysis was performed, and potential hazards, threats, consequences, and barriers were identified based on semi-structured interviews with industry experts and researchers' insights gained by observation of the inspection activities. Findings-The Bowtie diagram for visual inspection in engine maintenance identifies new consequences in the maintenance context. It provides a new understanding of the importance of certain controls in the workflow. Originality-This work adapts the Bowtie analysis to provide a risk assessment of the borescope inspection activity on aircraft maintenance tasks, which was otherwise not shown in the literature. The consequences for maintenance are also different compared to flight operations, in the way operational economics are included.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Application of Bow-tie methodology to improve patient safety [J].
Abdi, Zhaleh ;
Ravaghi, Hamid ;
Abbasi, Mohsen ;
Delgoshaei, Bahram ;
Esfandiari, Somayeh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2016, 29 (04) :425-440
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, CGE RISK BOWTIEXP SO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ERGONOMICS AUSTR
[4]   Taxonomy of Gas Turbine Blade Defects [J].
Aust, Jonas ;
Pons, Dirk .
AEROSPACE, 2019, 6 (05)
[5]  
Brown K., MET351XREP001
[6]  
CAA, 2011, CAA SIGN 7 TASK FORC
[7]   The application of the Four Essentials Bow Tie Diagram to enhance business success [J].
Cardwell, Geoff .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2008, 19 (1-2) :37-45
[8]  
Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), BOWT RISK ASS MOD
[9]  
Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) of New Zealand, MAK SAF AV EV SAF CI
[10]  
Clemens P.I., 1998, System safety and risk management: A guide for engineering educators