Concentration: The Neural Underpinnings of How Cognitive Load Shields Against Distraction

被引:52
作者
Sorqvist, Patrik [1 ,2 ]
Dahlstrom, Orjan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Karlsson, Thomas [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ronnberg, Jerker [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gavle, Dept Bldg Energy & Environm Engn, Gavle, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Linnaeus Ctr, Swedish Inst Disabil Res, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Dept Behav Sci & Learning, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Linkoping Univ, Ctr Med Image Sci & Visualizat CMIV, Linkoping, Sweden
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2016年 / 10卷
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
working memory; selective attention; concentration; cognitive load; distraction; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; AUDITORY SELECTIVE ATTENTION; PERCEPTUAL LOAD; HUMAN AMYGDALA; BRAIN-STEM; FMRI; MODULATION; PARADIGM; METAANALYSIS; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2016.00221
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Whether cognitive load and other aspects of task difficulty increases or decreases distractibility is subject of much debate in contemporary psychology. One camp argues that cognitive load usurps executive resources, which otherwise could be used for attentional control, and therefore cognitive load increases distraction. The other camp argues that cognitive load demands high levels of concentration (focal task engagement), which suppresses peripheral processing and therefore decreases distraction. In this article, we employed an functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) protocol to explore whether higher cognitive load in a visually-presented task suppresses task-irrelevant auditory processing in cortical and subcortical areas. The results show that selectively attending to an auditory stimulus facilitates its neural processing in the auditory cortex, and switching the locus-of-attention to the visual modality decreases the neural response in the auditory cortex. When the cognitive load of the task presented in the visual modality increases, the neural response to the auditory stimulus is further suppressed, along with increased activity in networks related to effortful attention. Taken together, the results suggest that higher cognitive load decreases peripheral processing of task-irrelevant information which decreases distractibility as a side effect of the increased activity in a focused-attention network.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Conceptual and methodological concerns in the theory of perceptual load
    Benoni, Hanna
    Tsal, Yehoshua
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
  • [2] Working memory controls involuntary attention switching:: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm
    Berti, S
    Schröger, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 17 (05) : 1119 - 1122
  • [3] Brett M., 2002, REG INTEREST ANAL US, V13, P210
  • [4] An Investigation of the Structural, Connectional, and Functional Subspecialization in the Human Amygdala
    Bzdok, Danilo
    Laird, Angela R.
    Zilles, Karl
    Fox, Peter T.
    Eickhoff, Simon B.
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2013, 34 (12) : 3247 - 3266
  • [5] Executive control suppresses pupillary responses to aversive stimuli
    Cohen, Noga
    Moyal, Natali
    Henik, Avishai
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 112 : 1 - 11
  • [6] The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity
    Conway, ARA
    Cowan, N
    Bunting, MF
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2001, 8 (02) : 331 - 335
  • [7] The role of working memory in auditory selective attention
    Dalton, Polly
    Santangelo, Valerio
    Spence, Charles
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 62 (11) : 2126 - 2132
  • [8] Fear is only as deep as the mind allows A coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on the regulation of negative affect
    Diekhof, Esther Kristina
    Geier, Katharina
    Falkai, Peter
    Gruber, Oliver
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2011, 58 (01) : 275 - 285
  • [9] Doron NN, 2000, J COMP NEUROL, V425, P257
  • [10] A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data
    Eickhoff, SB
    Stephan, KE
    Mohlberg, H
    Grefkes, C
    Fink, GR
    Amunts, K
    Zilles, K
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 25 (04) : 1325 - 1335