Good and poor mobilizing patients differ in mobilized CD34+cell adhesion molecule profiles

被引:7
作者
Ford, CD
Greenwood, J
Anderson, J
Handrahan, D
Petersen, FB
机构
[1] Latter Day St Hosp, Utah Blood & Marrow Transplant Program, Salt Lake City, UT 84143 USA
[2] Latter Day St Hosp, Dept Pathol, Salt Lake City, UT 84143 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0041-1132.2004.04035.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Alterations in expression of adhesion molecules are important in the trafficking of hematopoietic progenitors and probably in the mobilization process. Relatively little and conflicting data are currently available on the differences in expression between good and poor mobilizing patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this study, the expression of eight adhesion molecules on the collected CD34+ cells from 36 patients undergoing mobilization was determined. RESULTS: Good mobilizing patients, defined as those who collected their target in one apheresis procedure, had significantly fewer cells that expressed CD11a (LFA-1) and CD54 (ICAM-1) and borderline fewer that expressed CD11c, CD49d (VLA-4), and CD49d (VLA-5). No differences were detected in CD11b (Mac-1), CD15s (sLe(x)), or CD62L (L-selectin). Linear regression analysis identified number of prior chemotherapy courses and expression of CD11 a (LFA-1) as independent predictive factors for mobilization efficiency. Good and poor mobilizing patients had approximately the same number of total CD34+ cells collected and little difference in times to engraftment. CONCLUSIONS: CD11a (LFA-1) expression inversely correlates with mobilization efficiency. Elucidation of the mechanism(s) underlying these observations will require further study.
引用
收藏
页码:1769 / 1773
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Antibodies to VLA4 integrin mobilize long-term repopulating cells and augment cytokine-induced mobilization in primates and mice [J].
Craddock, CF ;
Nakamoto, B ;
Andrews, RG ;
Priestley, GV ;
Papayannopoulou, T .
BLOOD, 1997, 90 (12) :4779-4788
[2]  
DERCKSEN MW, 1995, J CLIN ONCOL, V11, P3313
[3]   Analysis of the effect of prior therapy on progenitor cell yield: use of a chemotherapy scoring system [J].
Drake, M ;
Ranaghan, L ;
Morris, TCM ;
Nolan, L ;
Desai, ZR ;
Irvine, AE ;
Jordan, A ;
Magill, K ;
Price, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1997, 98 (03) :745-749
[4]   Effect of prior chemotherapy on hematopoietic stem cell mobilization [J].
Ford, CD ;
Green, W ;
Warenski, S ;
Petersen, FB .
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 33 (09) :901-905
[5]   Change in CD34+cell concentration during peripheral blood progenitor cell collection: effects on collection efficiency and efficacy [J].
Ford, CD ;
Greenwood, J ;
Strupp, A ;
Lehman, CM .
TRANSFUSION, 2002, 42 (07) :904-911
[6]   Expression of adhesion molecules on CD34+ cells in peripheral blood of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients mobilized with different growth factors [J].
Gazitt, Y ;
Shaughnessy, P ;
Liu, Q .
STEM CELLS, 2001, 19 (02) :134-143
[7]   Recent developments in the regulation of peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and engraftment by cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules [J].
Gazitt, Y .
JOURNAL OF HEMATOTHERAPY & STEM CELL RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (02) :229-236
[8]  
JOHANNES FM, 1998, BLOOD, V91, P4099
[9]  
Mohle R, 1995, EXP HEMATOL, V23, P1535
[10]   The chemokine SDF-1 stimulates integrin-mediated arrest of CD34+ cells on vascular endothelium under shear flow [J].
Peled, A ;
Grabovsky, V ;
Habler, L ;
Sandbank, J ;
Arenzana-Seisdedos, F ;
Petit, I ;
Ben-Hur, H ;
Lapidot, T ;
Alon, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1999, 104 (09) :1199-1211