Economic and environmental performances of organic photovoltaics with battery storage for residential self-consumption

被引:20
作者
Chatzisideris, Marios D. [1 ]
Ohms, Pernille K. [2 ]
Espinosa, Nieves [3 ]
Krebs, Frederik C. [1 ]
Laurent, Alexis [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Energy Convers & Storage, Roskilde, Denmark
[2] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Sustainabil Div, DTU Management, Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment Grp, Lyngby, Denmark
[3] European Commiss, Directorate B Growth & Innovat, Joint Res Ctr, Seville, Spain
关键词
Organic photovoltaics; Economic analysis; Cost optimisation; Life cycle assessment; LCA; Electricity self-consumption; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENERGY-STORAGE; SOLAR-CELLS; SYSTEMS; IMPACT; EFFICIENCY; COSTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113977
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Recent economic developments have signalled that self-consumption of photovoltaics (PV)-generated electricity could be financially more attractive than exporting it to the grid in many countries. As an emerging PV technology, organic photovoltaics (OPV) have been recognized as potential bearer of economic and environmental gains. Yet, could OPV deliver a profitable investment and environmental impact reductions in the context of residential electricity self-consumption? Here, we conduct a study of unprecedented scoping that combines both economic analysis and life cycle assessment to gauge OPV self-consumption with or without battery storage for household settings. The upscaling of OPV technologies from pilot- to industrial scale was modelled, and we used the two contrasting cases of Denmark and Greece to identify potential patterns. Our economic results indicate that the addition of battery storage is not financially viable unless battery costs are reduced by more than 10% for Greece and 30% for Denmark. Furthermore, we identify OPV cost thresholds of 0.9 (sic)/Wp for Denmark and 1.6 (sic)/Wp for Greece, below which OPV-battery systems are more cost-effective than OPV systems without battery. Building on the economic analysis, we find that battery storage can improve the environmental performances of OPV systems under certain conditions on the battery costs, the capacity of the cost-optimal OPV-battery system, and the environmental impacts of the battery. Furthermore, the composition of the electricity grid mix in the country studied was found to be an important factor to determine where OPV self-consumption was environmentally beneficial. These findings can support energy policy-makers in their development of energy strategies as well as OPV technology developers, who should adopt a systemic approach and integrate battery storage and the balance of system within their development phases.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[41]   Quantifying self-consumption linked to solar home battery systems: Statistical analysis and economic assessment [J].
Quoilin, Sylvain ;
Kavvadias, Konstantinos ;
Mercier, Arnaud ;
Pappone, Irene ;
Zucker, Andreas .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 182 :58-67
[42]   Impact of shared battery energy storage systems on photovoltaic self-consumption and electricity bills in apartment buildings [J].
Roberts, Mike B. ;
Bruce, Anna ;
MacGill, Lain .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 245 :78-95
[43]   Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households' for micro-generation technologies [J].
Scarpa, Riccardo ;
Willis, Ken .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (01) :129-136
[44]  
Schmidt JH., 2011, Inventory of country specific electricity in LCA - Consequential and attributional scenarios
[45]   Photovoltaic systems coupled with batteries that are optimally sized for household self-consumption: Assessment of peak shaving potential [J].
Schram, Wouter L. ;
Lampropoulos, Ioannis ;
van Sark, Wilfried G. J. H. M. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 223 :69-81
[46]  
Stenzel P, 2014, IEEE INT ENER CONF, P1334, DOI 10.1109/ENERGYCON.2014.6850596
[47]   Life cycle inventories of electricity generation and power supply in version 3 of the ecoinvent database-part II: electricity markets [J].
Treyer, Karin ;
Bauer, Christian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (09) :1255-1268
[48]   Life-cycle assessment of cradle-to-grave opportunities and environmental impacts of organic photovoltaic solar panels compared to conventional technologies [J].
Tsang, Michael P. ;
Sonnemann, Guido W. ;
Bassani, Dario M. .
SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2016, 156 :37-48
[49]   Progress in emerging solution-processed thin film solar cells - Part I: Polymer solar cells [J].
Wang, Qin ;
Xie, Yu ;
Soltani-Kordshuli, Firuze ;
Eslamian, Morteza .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 56 :347-361
[50]   Sizing of Battery Converters for Residential PV Storage Systems [J].
Weniger, Johannes ;
Tjaden, Tjarko ;
Bergner, Joseph ;
Quaschning, Volker .
10TH INTERNATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY STORAGE CONFERENCE, IRES 2016, 2016, 99 :3-10