Economic and environmental performances of organic photovoltaics with battery storage for residential self-consumption

被引:20
作者
Chatzisideris, Marios D. [1 ]
Ohms, Pernille K. [2 ]
Espinosa, Nieves [3 ]
Krebs, Frederik C. [1 ]
Laurent, Alexis [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Energy Convers & Storage, Roskilde, Denmark
[2] Tech Univ Denmark DTU, Sustainabil Div, DTU Management, Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment Grp, Lyngby, Denmark
[3] European Commiss, Directorate B Growth & Innovat, Joint Res Ctr, Seville, Spain
关键词
Organic photovoltaics; Economic analysis; Cost optimisation; Life cycle assessment; LCA; Electricity self-consumption; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENERGY-STORAGE; SOLAR-CELLS; SYSTEMS; IMPACT; EFFICIENCY; COSTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113977
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Recent economic developments have signalled that self-consumption of photovoltaics (PV)-generated electricity could be financially more attractive than exporting it to the grid in many countries. As an emerging PV technology, organic photovoltaics (OPV) have been recognized as potential bearer of economic and environmental gains. Yet, could OPV deliver a profitable investment and environmental impact reductions in the context of residential electricity self-consumption? Here, we conduct a study of unprecedented scoping that combines both economic analysis and life cycle assessment to gauge OPV self-consumption with or without battery storage for household settings. The upscaling of OPV technologies from pilot- to industrial scale was modelled, and we used the two contrasting cases of Denmark and Greece to identify potential patterns. Our economic results indicate that the addition of battery storage is not financially viable unless battery costs are reduced by more than 10% for Greece and 30% for Denmark. Furthermore, we identify OPV cost thresholds of 0.9 (sic)/Wp for Denmark and 1.6 (sic)/Wp for Greece, below which OPV-battery systems are more cost-effective than OPV systems without battery. Building on the economic analysis, we find that battery storage can improve the environmental performances of OPV systems under certain conditions on the battery costs, the capacity of the cost-optimal OPV-battery system, and the environmental impacts of the battery. Furthermore, the composition of the electricity grid mix in the country studied was found to be an important factor to determine where OPV self-consumption was environmentally beneficial. These findings can support energy policy-makers in their development of energy strategies as well as OPV technology developers, who should adopt a systemic approach and integrate battery storage and the balance of system within their development phases.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[11]  
European Commission, 2015, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Delivering a New Deal for Energy Consumers (COM (2015) 339 Final
[12]  
Fraunhofer institute for solar energy systems, 2019, PHOT REP 2018
[13]   The future costs of OPV A bottom-up model of material and manufacturing costs with uncertainty analysis [J].
Gambhir, Ajay ;
Sandwell, Philip ;
Nelson, Jenny .
SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2016, 156 :49-58
[14]   Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment [J].
Hauschild, Michael Z. ;
Goedkoop, Mark ;
Guinee, Jeroen ;
Heijungs, Reinout ;
Huijbregts, Mark ;
Jolliet, Olivier ;
Margni, Manuele ;
De Schryver, An ;
Humbert, Sebastien ;
Laurent, Alexis ;
Sala, Serenella ;
Pant, Rana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (03) :683-697
[15]   Prosumers in the Electricity System-Household vs. System Optimization of the Operation of Residential Photovoltaic Battery Systems [J].
Heinisch, Verena ;
Odenberger, Mikael ;
Goransson, Lisa ;
Johnsson, Filip .
FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2019, 6
[16]   Life Cycle Assessment and eco-efficiency of prospective, flexible, tandem organic photovoltaic module [J].
Hengevoss, Dirk ;
Baumgartner, Corinna ;
Nisato, Giovanni ;
Hugi, Christoph .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2016, 137 :317-327
[17]   Economic Optimization of Component Sizing for Residential Battery Storage Systems [J].
Hesse, Holger C. ;
Martins, Rodrigo ;
Musilek, Petr ;
Naumann, Maik ;
Cong Nam Truong ;
Jossen, Andreas .
ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (07)
[18]   The economic viability of battery storage for residential solar photovoltaic systems - A review and a simulation model [J].
Hoppmann, Joern ;
Volland, Jonas ;
Schmidt, Tobias S. ;
Hoffmann, Volker H. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 :1101-1118
[19]   ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level [J].
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. ;
Steinmann, Zoran J. N. ;
Elshout, Pieter M. F. ;
Stam, Gea ;
Verones, Francesca ;
Vieira, Marisa ;
Zijp, Michiel ;
Hollander, Anne ;
van Zelm, Rosalie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (02) :138-147
[20]  
IEA, 2018, WORLD EN OUTL 2018