Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the elderly: Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation

被引:0
|
作者
Meiltz, Alexandre [1 ]
Zimmermann, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop La Tour, Cardiovasc Dept, CH-1217 Meyrin, Switzerland
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2007年 / 30卷
关键词
atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; radiofrequency catheter ablation; catheter ablation in the elderly; slow pathway ablation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is considered the treatment of choice for patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). This study examined the efficacy and safety of RF ablation in patients with AVNRT >= 65 years of age. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data collected in 350 consecutive patients who underwent AVNRT RF ablation between 1995 and 2005. They were divided according to whether they were <65 years (Group 1, n = 280; mean age = 46 +/- 13 years, 69% women) or >= 65 years (Group 2, n = 70; mean age = 72 +/- 6 years, 59% women) of age. Results: Patients in Group 2 more often had structural heart disease (12/70 vs 17/280, P = 0.002) than in Group 1, though there was no difference in the prevalence of syncope (6/70 vs 18/280, P = 0.52) or atrial fibrillation (1/70 vs 6/280, P = 0.70) between the 2 groups. Before RF ablation, patients in Group 2 had a longer mean A-H intervals (90 +/- 31 ms vs 77 +/- 19 ms, P < 0.0001), H-V intervals (44 +/- 6 ms vs 41 +/- 5 ms, P < 0.0001), fast path way refractory period (358 +/- 14 ms, vs 335 +/- 68 ms, P= 0.01), and tachycardia cycle length (394 +/- 71 ms vs. 335 +/- 159 ms, P < 0.0001). A > 140 ms A-H interval was present in 3/70 patients in Group 2 versus 0/280 in Group 1 (P < 0.001). No difference was observed between the 2 groups in primary RF ablation success rate (70/70 vs 277/280, P = 0.38), overall procedure duration (75 +/- 35 minute vs 78 +/- 43 minute, P = 0.61), duration of fluoroscopic exposure (14 +/- 12 minute vs 13 +/- 12 minute, P = 0.63), or number of RF pulses (median 5 vs 4, P = 0.051). Two patients in Group 1 (0.57%) developed 3rd degree AV block requiring permanent pacing. Recurrences of AVNRT were limited to Group 1 (16/280 vs 0/70, P = 0.001). Conclusions: RF ablation of AVNRT was highly effective and safe in patients >= 65 years of age despite a higher prevalence of structural heart disease and longer A-H intervals at baseline. RF ablation might be considered as first-line therapy for the elderly with AVNRT.
引用
收藏
页码:S103 / S107
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Electrophysiological mechanisms of conversion of typical to atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia occurring after radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway
    Fujiki, A
    Usui, M
    Mizumaki, K
    Hayashi, H
    Nagasawa, H
    Inoue, H
    JAPANESE CIRCULATION JOURNAL-ENGLISH EDITION, 1999, 63 (12): : 999 - 1001
  • [42] Radiofrequency catheter ablation for incessant atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia normalized H-V block associated with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy
    Furushima, H
    Chinushi, M
    Sugiura, H
    Aizawa, Y
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2004, 37 (04) : 315 - 319
  • [43] Induction of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia by radiofrequency application
    Pellizzon, Oscar A.
    Nannini, Sebastian
    MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES, 2017, 77 (05) : 433 - 436
  • [44] Value of an old school approach: safety and long-term success of radiofrequency current catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children and young adolescents
    Siebels, Henrike
    Sohns, Christian
    Nuernberg, Jan-Hendrik
    Siebels, Juergen
    Langes, Klaus
    Hebe, Joachim
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 53 (02) : 267 - 277
  • [45] Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy after radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
    Latacha, Matthew P.
    Makan, Majesh
    Barry, Michael O.
    Smith, Timothy W.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2007, 4 (01) : 92 - 94
  • [46] Ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in tricuspid atresia
    Khairy, P
    Seslar, SP
    Triedman, JK
    Cecchin, F
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 15 (06) : 719 - 722
  • [47] Catheter ablation via the left atrium for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: A narrative review
    Wang, Norman C.
    HEART RHYTHM O2, 2021, 2 (02): : 187 - 200
  • [48] Catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, when AVNRT presented as a fetus or infant
    Jimenez, Erick
    El-Bokl, Amr
    Aggarwal, Varun
    Cortez, Daniel
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (11): : 1310 - 1314
  • [49] Cryothermal Catheter Ablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in a Pediatric Patient after Atrioventricular Canal Repair
    Rausch, Christopher M.
    Runciman, Martin
    Collins, Kathryn K.
    CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE, 2010, 5 (01) : 66 - 69
  • [50] Assessment of atrioventricular nodal electrophysiological characteristics after radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia - 3-month follow up
    Enjoji, Y
    Sugi, K
    Ikeda, T
    Kasao, M
    Noro, M
    Sakata, T
    Yabuki, S
    Yamaguchi, T
    JAPANESE CIRCULATION JOURNAL-ENGLISH EDITION, 1996, 60 (11): : 853 - 860