Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the elderly: Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation

被引:0
|
作者
Meiltz, Alexandre [1 ]
Zimmermann, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop La Tour, Cardiovasc Dept, CH-1217 Meyrin, Switzerland
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2007年 / 30卷
关键词
atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; radiofrequency catheter ablation; catheter ablation in the elderly; slow pathway ablation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is considered the treatment of choice for patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). This study examined the efficacy and safety of RF ablation in patients with AVNRT >= 65 years of age. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data collected in 350 consecutive patients who underwent AVNRT RF ablation between 1995 and 2005. They were divided according to whether they were <65 years (Group 1, n = 280; mean age = 46 +/- 13 years, 69% women) or >= 65 years (Group 2, n = 70; mean age = 72 +/- 6 years, 59% women) of age. Results: Patients in Group 2 more often had structural heart disease (12/70 vs 17/280, P = 0.002) than in Group 1, though there was no difference in the prevalence of syncope (6/70 vs 18/280, P = 0.52) or atrial fibrillation (1/70 vs 6/280, P = 0.70) between the 2 groups. Before RF ablation, patients in Group 2 had a longer mean A-H intervals (90 +/- 31 ms vs 77 +/- 19 ms, P < 0.0001), H-V intervals (44 +/- 6 ms vs 41 +/- 5 ms, P < 0.0001), fast path way refractory period (358 +/- 14 ms, vs 335 +/- 68 ms, P= 0.01), and tachycardia cycle length (394 +/- 71 ms vs. 335 +/- 159 ms, P < 0.0001). A > 140 ms A-H interval was present in 3/70 patients in Group 2 versus 0/280 in Group 1 (P < 0.001). No difference was observed between the 2 groups in primary RF ablation success rate (70/70 vs 277/280, P = 0.38), overall procedure duration (75 +/- 35 minute vs 78 +/- 43 minute, P = 0.61), duration of fluoroscopic exposure (14 +/- 12 minute vs 13 +/- 12 minute, P = 0.63), or number of RF pulses (median 5 vs 4, P = 0.051). Two patients in Group 1 (0.57%) developed 3rd degree AV block requiring permanent pacing. Recurrences of AVNRT were limited to Group 1 (16/280 vs 0/70, P = 0.001). Conclusions: RF ablation of AVNRT was highly effective and safe in patients >= 65 years of age despite a higher prevalence of structural heart disease and longer A-H intervals at baseline. RF ablation might be considered as first-line therapy for the elderly with AVNRT.
引用
收藏
页码:S103 / S107
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Selective radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway for common and uncommon atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
    Iesaka, Y
    Takahashi, A
    Goya, M
    Yamane, T
    Kojima, S
    Fujiwara, H
    Nitta, J
    Nogami, A
    Aonuma, K
    Hiroe, M
    Marumo, F
    Hiraoka, M
    JAPANESE HEART JOURNAL, 1996, 37 (05): : 759 - 770
  • [22] Radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in an orthotopic heart transplantation patient
    Nag, Tonusri
    Jacobson, Jason
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 41 (12): : 1684 - 1686
  • [23] Radiofrequency catheter ablation therapy of swallowing-induced atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Report of two cases
    Satish, OS
    Yeh, S
    Yeh, KH
    Wen, MS
    Wang, CC
    Chou, CC
    Wu, D
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (06): : 594 - 597
  • [24] Slow potential-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Characteristics of the potential associated with successful ablation
    Yamabe, H
    Okumura, K
    Tsuchiya, T
    Tabuchi, T
    Iwasa, A
    Yasue, H
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (12): : 2631 - 2640
  • [25] Ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the elderly: results from the German Ablation Registry
    Hoffmann, Boris A.
    Brachmann, Johannes
    Andresen, Dietrich
    Eckardt, Lars
    Hoffmann, Ellen
    Kuck, Karl-Heinz
    Schumacher, Burghard
    Spitzer, Stefan G.
    Schirdewahn, Petra
    Tebbenjohanns, Juergen
    Horack, Martin
    Senges, Jochen
    Salukhe, Tushar V.
    Rostock, Thomas
    Willems, Stephan
    HEART RHYTHM, 2011, 8 (07) : 981 - 987
  • [26] Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular junctional ("AV nodal") reentrant tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Kilborn, MJ
    McGuire, MA
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (12): : 2681 - 2684
  • [27] Comparison of late results of surgical or radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular node for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
    Kimman, GP
    van Hemel, NM
    Jessurun, ER
    van Dessel, PFHM
    Kelder, JC
    Defauw, JJAMT
    Guiraudon, GM
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1999, 20 (07) : 527 - 534
  • [28] Acute Outcomes of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Patients with Typical Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: A Single-Center Study
    Hasan, Waqar
    Shahid, Hafiz Abdul Mannan
    Saleem, Imran
    Qureshi, Amna Zafar
    Butt, Usman Mahmood
    PAKISTAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 57 (04): : 304 - 309
  • [29] Atrioventricular node anatomy and physiology: implications for ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
    Lee, Pi-Chang
    Chen, Shih-Ann
    Hwang, Betau
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 24 (02) : 105 - 112
  • [30] EVALUATION OF THE OPERATOR LEARNING CURVE FOR RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION FOR ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL REENTRANT TACHYCARDIA
    Kup, Ayhan
    Celik, Mehmet
    Kepez, Alper
    Demir, Serdar
    Gulsen, Kamil
    Ozgeyik, Mehmet
    Kanar, Batur Gonenc
    Karagoz, Ali
    Yildirim, Cagan
    Tanircan, Muhammed Rasit
    Akgun, Taylan
    Uslu, Abdulkadir
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2023, 63 (05) : 47 - 52