Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the elderly: Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation

被引:0
|
作者
Meiltz, Alexandre [1 ]
Zimmermann, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop La Tour, Cardiovasc Dept, CH-1217 Meyrin, Switzerland
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2007年 / 30卷
关键词
atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; radiofrequency catheter ablation; catheter ablation in the elderly; slow pathway ablation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is considered the treatment of choice for patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). This study examined the efficacy and safety of RF ablation in patients with AVNRT >= 65 years of age. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data collected in 350 consecutive patients who underwent AVNRT RF ablation between 1995 and 2005. They were divided according to whether they were <65 years (Group 1, n = 280; mean age = 46 +/- 13 years, 69% women) or >= 65 years (Group 2, n = 70; mean age = 72 +/- 6 years, 59% women) of age. Results: Patients in Group 2 more often had structural heart disease (12/70 vs 17/280, P = 0.002) than in Group 1, though there was no difference in the prevalence of syncope (6/70 vs 18/280, P = 0.52) or atrial fibrillation (1/70 vs 6/280, P = 0.70) between the 2 groups. Before RF ablation, patients in Group 2 had a longer mean A-H intervals (90 +/- 31 ms vs 77 +/- 19 ms, P < 0.0001), H-V intervals (44 +/- 6 ms vs 41 +/- 5 ms, P < 0.0001), fast path way refractory period (358 +/- 14 ms, vs 335 +/- 68 ms, P= 0.01), and tachycardia cycle length (394 +/- 71 ms vs. 335 +/- 159 ms, P < 0.0001). A > 140 ms A-H interval was present in 3/70 patients in Group 2 versus 0/280 in Group 1 (P < 0.001). No difference was observed between the 2 groups in primary RF ablation success rate (70/70 vs 277/280, P = 0.38), overall procedure duration (75 +/- 35 minute vs 78 +/- 43 minute, P = 0.61), duration of fluoroscopic exposure (14 +/- 12 minute vs 13 +/- 12 minute, P = 0.63), or number of RF pulses (median 5 vs 4, P = 0.051). Two patients in Group 1 (0.57%) developed 3rd degree AV block requiring permanent pacing. Recurrences of AVNRT were limited to Group 1 (16/280 vs 0/70, P = 0.001). Conclusions: RF ablation of AVNRT was highly effective and safe in patients >= 65 years of age despite a higher prevalence of structural heart disease and longer A-H intervals at baseline. RF ablation might be considered as first-line therapy for the elderly with AVNRT.
引用
收藏
页码:S103 / S107
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the elderly
    Rostock, T
    Risius, T
    Ventura, R
    Klemm, HU
    Weiss, C
    Keitel, A
    Meinertz, T
    Willems, S
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 16 (06) : 608 - 610
  • [2] RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL REENTRANT TACHYCARDIA IN CHILDREN
    TEIXEIRA, OHP
    BALAJI, S
    CASE, CL
    GILLETTE, PC
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 17 (10): : 1621 - 1626
  • [3] Electrophysiologic characteristics and results of radiofrequency catheter ablation in elderly patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
    Haghjoo, Majid
    Arya, Arash
    Heidari, Alireza
    Fazelifar, Amir Farjam
    Sadr-Ameli, Mohammad Ali
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2007, 40 (02) : 208 - 213
  • [4] Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in a patient with heart transplantation
    Zhu, DWX
    Sun, HB
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 2 (01) : 87 - 89
  • [5] Atrial Tachycardia as a Proarrhythmic Effect of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
    Beninati, Serena
    Perversi, Jacopo
    Scaglione, Marco
    Montefusco, Antonio
    Gaita, Fiorenzo
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (04): : e33 - e37
  • [6] Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Does the number of catheters matter?
    Mazur, Alexander
    Strasberg, Boris
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2006, 8 (07): : 497 - 498
  • [7] Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children:: curative treatment by radiofrequency catheter ablation
    Kriebel, T
    Bertram, H
    Windhagen-Mahnert, B
    Bökenkamp, R
    Kaulitz, R
    Rohloff, A
    Peuster, M
    Hausdorf, G
    Paul, T
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 2000, 89 (06): : 538 - 545
  • [8] Catheter Ablation of Atypical Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
    Katritsis, Demosthenes G.
    Marine, Joseph E.
    Contreras, Fernando M.
    Fujii, Akira
    Latchamsetty, Rakesh
    Siontis, Konstantinos C.
    Katritsis, George D.
    Zografos, Theodoros
    John, Roy M.
    Epstein, Lawrence M.
    Michaud, Gregory F.
    Anter, Elad
    Sepahpour, Ali
    Rowland, Edward
    Buxton, Alfred E.
    Calkins, Hugh
    Morady, Fred
    Stevenson, William G.
    Josephson, Mark E.
    CIRCULATION, 2016, 134 (21) : 1655 - +
  • [9] Case Report: Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in a Patient with Heart Transplantation
    Zhu D.W.X.
    Sun H.
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 1997, 2 (1) : 87 - 89
  • [10] COINCIDENT IDIOPATHIC LEFT-VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA AND ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL REENTRANT TACHYCARDIA - CONTROL BY RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION OF THE SLOW ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL PATHWAY
    WAGSHAL, AB
    MITTLEMAN, RS
    SCHUGER, CD
    HUANG, SKS
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 17 (03): : 386 - 396