Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in the elderly: Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation

被引:0
作者
Meiltz, Alexandre [1 ]
Zimmermann, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop La Tour, Cardiovasc Dept, CH-1217 Meyrin, Switzerland
来源
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY | 2007年 / 30卷
关键词
atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; radiofrequency catheter ablation; catheter ablation in the elderly; slow pathway ablation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is considered the treatment of choice for patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). This study examined the efficacy and safety of RF ablation in patients with AVNRT >= 65 years of age. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data collected in 350 consecutive patients who underwent AVNRT RF ablation between 1995 and 2005. They were divided according to whether they were <65 years (Group 1, n = 280; mean age = 46 +/- 13 years, 69% women) or >= 65 years (Group 2, n = 70; mean age = 72 +/- 6 years, 59% women) of age. Results: Patients in Group 2 more often had structural heart disease (12/70 vs 17/280, P = 0.002) than in Group 1, though there was no difference in the prevalence of syncope (6/70 vs 18/280, P = 0.52) or atrial fibrillation (1/70 vs 6/280, P = 0.70) between the 2 groups. Before RF ablation, patients in Group 2 had a longer mean A-H intervals (90 +/- 31 ms vs 77 +/- 19 ms, P < 0.0001), H-V intervals (44 +/- 6 ms vs 41 +/- 5 ms, P < 0.0001), fast path way refractory period (358 +/- 14 ms, vs 335 +/- 68 ms, P= 0.01), and tachycardia cycle length (394 +/- 71 ms vs. 335 +/- 159 ms, P < 0.0001). A > 140 ms A-H interval was present in 3/70 patients in Group 2 versus 0/280 in Group 1 (P < 0.001). No difference was observed between the 2 groups in primary RF ablation success rate (70/70 vs 277/280, P = 0.38), overall procedure duration (75 +/- 35 minute vs 78 +/- 43 minute, P = 0.61), duration of fluoroscopic exposure (14 +/- 12 minute vs 13 +/- 12 minute, P = 0.63), or number of RF pulses (median 5 vs 4, P = 0.051). Two patients in Group 1 (0.57%) developed 3rd degree AV block requiring permanent pacing. Recurrences of AVNRT were limited to Group 1 (16/280 vs 0/70, P = 0.001). Conclusions: RF ablation of AVNRT was highly effective and safe in patients >= 65 years of age despite a higher prevalence of structural heart disease and longer A-H intervals at baseline. RF ablation might be considered as first-line therapy for the elderly with AVNRT.
引用
收藏
页码:S103 / S107
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Age dependence of complete heart block complicating radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular nodal slow pathway [J].
Boulos, M ;
Hoch, D ;
Schecter, S ;
Greenberg, S ;
Levine, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 82 (03) :390-+
[2]   Acute and long-term results of slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia - An analysis of the predictive factors for arrhythmia recurrence [J].
Estner, HL ;
Ndrepepa, G ;
Dong, J ;
Deisenhofer, I ;
Schreieck, S ;
Schneider, M ;
Plewan, A ;
Karch, M ;
Weyerbrock, S ;
Wade, D ;
Zrenner, B ;
Schmitt, C .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (02) :102-110
[3]   ELIMINATION OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL REENTRANT TACHYCARDIA USING DISCRETE SLOW POTENTIALS TO GUIDE APPLICATION OF RADIOFREQUENCY ENERGY [J].
HAISSAGUERRE, M ;
GAITA, F ;
FISCHER, B ;
COMMENGES, D ;
MONTSERRAT, P ;
DIVERNOIS, C ;
LEMETAYER, P ;
WARIN, JF .
CIRCULATION, 1992, 85 (06) :2162-2175
[4]   PREDICTION OF ATRIOVENTRICULAR-BLOCK DURING RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION OF THE SLOW PATHWAY OF THE ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE [J].
HINTRINGER, F ;
HARTIKAINEN, J ;
DAVIES, W ;
HEALD, SC ;
GILL, JS ;
WARD, DE ;
ROWLAND, E .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 92 (12) :3490-3496
[5]   TREATMENT OF SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA DUE TO ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODAL REENTRY BY RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION OF SLOW-PATHWAY CONDUCTION [J].
JACKMAN, WM ;
BECKMAN, KJ ;
MCCLELLAND, JH ;
WANG, XZ ;
FRIDAY, KJ ;
ROMAN, CA ;
MOULTON, KP ;
TWIDALE, N ;
HAZLITT, HA ;
PRIOR, MI ;
OREN, J ;
OVERHOLT, ED ;
LAZZARA, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (05) :313-318
[6]   AV nodal re-entry tachycardia in elderly patients: clinical presentation and results of radiofrequency catheter ablation therapy [J].
Kalusche, D ;
Ott, P ;
Arentz, T ;
Stockinger, J ;
Betz, P ;
Roskamm, H .
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 1998, 9 (06) :359-363
[7]   Risk of development of delayed atrioventricular block after slow pathway modification in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and a pre-existing prolonged PR interval [J].
Li, YG ;
Grönefeld, G ;
Bender, B ;
Machura, C ;
Hohnloser, SH .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (01) :89-95
[8]   Safety of slow pathway ablation in patients with long PR interval: Further evidence of fast and slow pathway interaction [J].
Natale, A ;
Greenfield, RA ;
Geiger, MJ ;
Newby, KH ;
Kent, V ;
Wharton, JM ;
Kearney, MM ;
Brandon, MJ ;
Zimerman, L .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (06) :1698-1703
[9]   Long-term safety and efficacy of slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and pre-existing prolonged PR interval [J].
Pasquié, JL ;
Scalzi, J ;
Macia, JC ;
Leclercq, F ;
Grolleau-Raoux, R .
EUROPACE, 2006, 8 (02) :129-133
[10]  
PELARGONIO G, 1999, PACING CLIN ELECTROP, V22, P796