Human nature and personality variation: Reconnecting evolutionary psychology with the science of individual differences

被引:4
|
作者
Maestripieri, Dario [1 ]
Boutwell, Brian B. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Inst Mind & Biol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Mississippi, Dept Criminal Justice & Legal Studiesm, University, MS 38677 USA
[3] Univ Mississippi Med Ctr, John D Bower Sch Populat Hlth, Jackson, MS USA
关键词
Human nature; Individual differences; Personality; Genetics; Evolutionary psychology; ALTERNATIVE REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES; GENETIC-VARIATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; TWIN RESEARCH; AUTISTIC-LIKE; HERITABILITY; TRAITS; METAANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENT; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104946
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The scientific study of human behavior from a modern evolutionary perspective began in the 20th century with disciplines such as human ethology and behavioral ecology as well as sociobiology. This early work focused on the characterization of a universal human nature that could be observed across all societies and cultures, one believed to have emerged in part from evolutionary processes. With the passage of time a newer evolutionary discipline, evolutionary psychology, emerged in the early 1990 s and quickly flourished. The focus on human nature was retained from its forerunners, but the primary focus of the field underwent a decided shift. Gone was the emphasis on observable behaviors and in its place moved psychological and cognitive functioning. At the same time, the new field took an interesting departure from other branches of psychology by largely relegating the significance of individual differences across cognitive and personality styles (whether heritable or environ-mental in origin) to a minor role. In this paper, we review the primary original arguments for minimizing or ignoring the importance of individual differences in personality and cognition, all in the service of making the case that the study of human nature, and evolutionary psychology more generally, is not at odds with individual differences research. The two fields have always been complementary, with one serving as a frequent source of insight for the other.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [21] Individual differences in human-technology interaction: incorporating variation in human characteristics into human factors and ergonomics research and design
    Szalma, J. L.
    THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2009, 10 (05) : 381 - 397
  • [22] Individual Differences Facing the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Age, Gender, Personality, and Positive Psychology
    Bernabe-Valero, Gloria
    Melero-Fuentes, David
    De Lima Argimon, Irani I.
    Gerbino, Maria
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [23] THE MODEL OF THE THREE HUMAN PERSONALITY TYPES: A UNIQUE TOOL FOR THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS
    Paschalidis, G.
    Stathopoulou, A.
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI 2012), 2012, : 2050 - 2059
  • [24] Animal personality in multiple stressor environments: the evolutionary ecology of among-individual differences in responses to stressor suites
    Grunst, Andrea S.
    Grunst, Melissa L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 291 (2033)
  • [25] Differences in personality characteristics between body-modified and non-modified individuals: Associations with individual personality traits and their possible evolutionary implications
    Wohlrab, Silke
    Stahl, Jutta
    Rammsayer, Thomas
    Kappeler, Peter M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2007, 21 (07) : 931 - 951
  • [27] MAINTENANCE OF GENETIC VARIATION IN HUMAN PERSONALITY: TESTING EVOLUTIONARY MODELS BY ESTIMATING HERITABILITY DUE TO COMMON CAUSAL VARIANTS AND INVESTIGATING THE EFFECT OF DISTANT INBREEDING
    Verweij, Karin J. H.
    Yang, Jian
    Lahti, Jari
    Veijola, Juha
    Hintsanen, Mirka
    Pulkki-Raback, Laura
    Heinonen, Kati
    Pouta, Anneli
    Pesonen, Anu-Katriina
    Widen, Elisabeth
    Taanila, Anja
    Isohanni, Matti
    Miettunen, Jouko
    Palotie, Aarno
    Penke, Lars
    Service, Susan K.
    Heath, Andrew C.
    Montgomery, Grant W.
    Raitakari, Olli
    Kahonen, Mika
    Viikari, Jorma
    Raikkonen, Katri
    Eriksson, Johan G.
    Keltikangas-Jarvinen, Liisa
    Lehtimaki, Terho
    Martin, Nicholas G.
    Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta
    Visscher, Peter M.
    Keller, Matthew C.
    Zietsch, Brendan P.
    EVOLUTION, 2012, 66 (10) : 3238 - 3251
  • [28] Individual variation in cognitive processing style predicts differences in phonetic imitation of device and human voices
    Snyder, Cathryn
    Cohn, Michelle
    Zellou, Georgia
    INTERSPEECH 2019, 2019, : 116 - 120
  • [29] Evolutionary psychology’s moral implicationsJohn Cartwright, Evolution and Human Behavior: Darwinian Perspectives on Human Nature. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2008
    Matthew C. Braddock
    Biology & Philosophy, 2009, 24 (4) : 531 - 540