Outcome-Oriented Predictive Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmark

被引:205
作者
Teinemaa, Irene [1 ]
Dumas, Marlon [1 ]
La Rosa, Marcello [2 ]
Maggi, Fabrizio Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tartu, J Liivi 2, EE-50409 Tartu, Estonia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Level 10,Doug McDonell Bldg, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Business process; predictive monitoring; sequence classification; EARLY CLASSIFICATION; CLASSIFIERS;
D O I
10.1145/3301300
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Predictive business process monitoring refers to the act of making predictions about the future state of ongoing cases of a business process, based on their incomplete execution traces and logs of historical (completed) traces. Motivated by the increasingly pervasive availability of fine-grained event data about business process executions, the problem of predictive process monitoring has received substantial attention in the past years. In particular, a considerable number of methods have been put forward to address the problem of outcome-oriented predictive process monitoring, which refers to classifying each ongoing case of a process according to a given set of possible categorical outcomes-e.g., Will the customer complain or not? Will an order be delivered, canceled, or withdrawn? Unfortunately, different authors have used different datasets, experimental settings, evaluation measures, and baselines to assess their proposals, resulting in poor comparability and an unclear picture of the relative merits and applicability of different methods. To address this gap, this article presents a systematic review and taxonomy of outcome-oriented predictive process monitoring methods, and a comparative experimental evaluation of eleven representative methods using a benchmark covering 24 predictive process monitoring tasks based on nine real-life event logs.
引用
收藏
页数:57
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [2] [Anonymous], INT C BUS PROC MAN
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, P 24 ADV NEUR INF PR
  • [4] The use of the area under the roc curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms
    Bradley, AP
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1997, 30 (07) : 1145 - 1159
  • [5] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [6] Castells M, 2005, INFORM AGE SER, P1
  • [7] Conforti Raffaele, 2013, Advanced Information Systems Engineering. 25th International Conference, CAiSE 2013. Proceedings: LNCS 7908, P116, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-38709-8_8
  • [8] A recommendation system for predicting risks across multiple business process instances
    Conforti, Raffaele
    de Leoni, Massimiliano
    La Rosa, Marcello
    van der Aalst, Wil M. P.
    ter Hofstede, Arthur H. M.
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2015, 69 : 1 - 19
  • [9] A general process mining framework for correlating, predicting and clustering dynamic behavior based on event logs
    de Leoni, Massimiliano
    van der Aalst, Wil M. P.
    Dees, Marcus
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2016, 56 : 235 - 257
  • [10] de Leoni M, 2014, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8659, P250, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-10172-9_16