CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND OF THE FELINE KIDNEY

被引:18
作者
Kinns, Jennifer [1 ]
Aronson, Lilian [2 ]
Hauptman, Joe [1 ]
Seiler, Gabriela [3 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Small Anim Clin Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Matthew J Vet Hosp, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] N Carolina State Univ, CVM, Dept Mol Biomed Sci, Raleigh, NC 27606 USA
关键词
cat; CHUS; Doppler; harmonic; HARMONIC ULTRASOUND; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY; RENAL PERFUSION; LIVER NODULES; POWER DOPPLER; DOGS; CATS; SONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01646.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound offers a noninvasive means of subjectively and quantitatively evaluating renal perfusion in cats with renal disease, or in renal transplant patients. In this study, we characterized the pattern of ultrasonographic contrast enhancement in 16 normal feline kidneys in eight cats using contrast-enhanced power Doppler and contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasound techniques. Mean time to peak contrast enhancement for the whole kidney was longer using contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasound (16.8s, SD 4.7s) than contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound (12.2s, SD 1.8s). The time to peak enhancement for the cortex alone in contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasound was 13s (SD 3.2s), and for the renal medulla was 25.5s (SD 8.7s). The half time for washout of contrast agent was 39s (SD 14.5s) for contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasound. The pattern of contrast enhancement in these normal feline kidneys can be used as normal reference values for the evaluation of clinical patients. Contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasound may allow the differentiation between cortical and medullary perfusion patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 172
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Quantification of renal perfusion using an intravascular contrast agent (Part 1): Results in a canine model [J].
Aumann, S ;
Schoenberg, SO ;
Just, A ;
Briley-Saebo, K ;
Bjornerud, A ;
Bock, M ;
Brix, G .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 49 (02) :276-287
[2]   Quantitative evaluation of Imagent® as an abdominal ultrasound contrast medium in dogs [J].
Bahr, A ;
Wrigley, R ;
Salman, M .
VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2000, 41 (01) :50-55
[3]   Use of computed tomography renal angiography for screening feline renal transplant donors [J].
Bouma, JL ;
Aronson, LR ;
Keith, DG ;
Saunders, HM .
VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2003, 44 (06) :636-641
[4]   Renal nuclear medicine: A review [J].
Daniel, GB ;
Mitchell, SK ;
Mawby, D ;
Sackman, JE ;
Schmidt, D .
VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 1999, 40 (06) :572-587
[5]  
Gruenewald S M, 1999, Australas Radiol, V43, P180, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1673.1999.00655.x
[6]   Sonographic and scintigraphic evaluation of acute renal allograft rejection in cats [J].
Halling, KB ;
Graham, JP ;
Newell, SP ;
Ellison, GW ;
Detrisac, CJ ;
Martin, FG ;
VanGilder, JM ;
Grossman, D .
VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2003, 44 (06) :707-713
[7]   Contrast harmonic ultrasonography of splenic masses and associated liver nodules in dogs [J].
Ivancic, Marina ;
Long, Fenella ;
Seiler, Gabriela S. .
JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 234 (01) :88-94
[8]   Echo contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of angiogenesis in renal cell carcinoma [J].
Kabakci, N ;
Igci, E ;
Secil, M ;
Yorukoglu, K ;
Mungan, U ;
Celebi, H ;
Kirkali, Z .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (06) :747-753
[9]   Multigated contrast-enhanced power Doppler to measure blood flow in mice tumors [J].
Kamotani, Y ;
Lee, WMF ;
Arger, PH ;
Cary, TW ;
Sehgal, CM .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 29 (07) :977-984
[10]  
Kim B, 2001, J ULTRAS MED, V20, P5