Attitudes toward evaluation: An exploratory study of students' and stakeholders' social representations

被引:10
作者
Schultes, Marie-Therese [1 ,2 ]
Kollmayer, Marlene [1 ]
Mejeh, Mathias [3 ]
Spiel, Christiane [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Fac Psychol, Dept Appl Psychol Work Educ Econ, Univ Str 7,Room B602, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ Zurich, Inst Educ, Dept Special Educ Focus Soc Participat & Disabil, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Attitudes; Stakeholders; Social representations; Free associations; Participatory evaluation; EVALUATION CAPACITY; ASSOCIATIONS; INVOLVEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.06.002
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Positive attitudes toward evaluation among stakeholders are an important precondition for successful evaluation processes. However, empirical studies focusing on stakeholders' attitudes toward evaluation are scarce. The present paper explores the approach of assessing social representations as indicators of people's attitudes toward evaluation. In an exploratory study, two groups were surveyed: University students (n = 60) with rather theoretical knowledge of evaluation and stakeholders (n = 61) who had shortly before taken part in participatory evaluation studies. Both groups were asked to name their free associations with the term "evaluation", which were subsequently analyzed lexicographically. The results indicate different social representations of evaluation in the two groups. The student group primarily saw evaluation as an "appraisal", whereas the stakeholders emphasized the "improvement" resulting from evaluation. Implications for further evaluation research and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 50
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Abric J., 2001, Representations of the Social: Bridging Theoretical Traditions
[2]   The Historical Development of Evaluation Use [J].
Alkin, Marvin C. ;
King, Jean A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2016, 37 (04) :568-579
[3]  
Allport G.W., 1935, A handbook of social psychology, P789, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412956253
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1961, PSYCHOANALYSE SON IM
[5]  
[Anonymous], SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTEN
[6]  
[Anonymous], KOMMUNIKATION INTERA
[7]  
Atria Moira, 2006, HDB PSYCHOL BERATUNG, P574
[8]  
Brandes S, 2013, PRAVENT GESUNDHEIT, V8, P132, DOI 10.1007/s11553-013-0390-5
[9]   The State of the Empirical Research Literature on Stakeholder Involvement in Program Evaluation [J].
Brandon, Paul R. ;
Fukunaga, Landry L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2014, 35 (01) :26-44
[10]   The True Impact of Evaluation: Motivation for ECB [J].
Clinton, Janet .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2014, 35 (01) :120-127