Accuracy of fibronectin tests for the prediction of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review

被引:17
作者
Leeflang, M. M. G.
Cnossen, J. S.
van der Post, J. A. M.
Mol, B. W. J.
Khan, K. S.
ter Riet, G.
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol Biostat & Bioinformat, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ Zurich, Horten Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY | 2007年 / 133卷 / 01期
关键词
pre-eclampsia; prediction; sensitivity and specificity; fibronectin; fetal fibronectin;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.01.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to review systematically all studies that assessed the accuracy of maternal plasma fibronectin as a serum marker for early prediction of pre-eclampsia. We therefore assessed studies that reported on fibronectin as serum marker for pre-eclampsia before the 25th gestational week. For the selected studies, sensitivity and specificity were calculated and plotted in ROC-space. We included 12 studies, of which only 5 studies reported sufficient data to calculate accuracy estimates, such as sensitivity and specificity. These five studies reported on 573 pregnant women of whom 109 developed pre-eclampsia. At a sensitivity of at least 50%, specificities ranged between 72 and 96% for cellular fibronectin. For total fibronectin, these numbers were 42-94%. Fibronectin seems to be a promising marker for the prediction of pre-eclampsia, however, further studies are needed to determine whether the accuracy of this test is sufficient to be clinically relevant. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 19
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[2]  
Ascarelli M H, 1997, Obstet Gynecol Surv, V52, pS1, DOI 10.1097/00006254-199704000-00024
[3]   Probability analysis for diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in postmenopausal bleeding: an approach for a rational diagnostic workup [J].
Bachmann, LM ;
ter Riet, G ;
Clark, TJ ;
Gupta, JK ;
Khan, KS .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 82 (06) :564-569
[4]   Identifying diagnostic studies in MEDLINE: Reducing the number needed to read [J].
Bachmann, LM ;
Coray, R ;
Estermann, P ;
ter Riet, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2002, 9 (06) :653-658
[5]   Towards complete and,accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCE .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7379) :41-44
[6]  
BROUGHTON PF, 1996, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V103, P603
[7]   Maternal plasma cellular fibronectin concentrations in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies:: A longitudinal study for early prediction of preeclampsia [J].
Chavarría, ME ;
Lara-González, L ;
González-Gleason, A ;
Sojo, I ;
Reyes, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (03) :595-601
[8]   HISTORY AND EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PREECLAMPSIA-ECLAMPSIA [J].
CHESLEY, LC .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1984, 27 (04) :801-820
[9]   World health organization systematic review of screening tests for preeclampsia [J].
Cnossen, JS ;
Mol, BW ;
van Der Post, JAM ;
Bossuyt, PMM ;
ter Riet, G .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (05) :1151-1152
[10]   World Health Organization systematic review of screening tests for preeclampsia [J].
Conde-Agudelo, A ;
Villar, J ;
Lindheimer, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 104 (06) :1367-1391