Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology

被引:33
作者
Geijer, Hakan [1 ]
Geijer, Mats
Forsberg, Lillemor
Kheddache, Susanne
Sund, Patrik
机构
[1] Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, SE-70185 Orebro, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
PACS; displays; digital imaging; luminance; image quality; monitor; medical imaging; liquid crystal display;
D O I
10.1007/s10278-007-9028-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In diagnostic radiology, medical-grade monochrome displays are usually recommended because of their higher luminance. Standard color displays can be used as a less expensive alternative, but have a lower luminance. The aim of the present study was to compare image quality for these two types of displays. Images of a CDRAD contrast-detail phantom were read by four radiologists using a 2-megapixel (MP) color display (143 cd/m(2) maximum luminance) as well as 2-MP (295 cd/m(2)) and 3-MP monochrome displays. Thirty lumbar spine radiographs were also read by four radiologists using the color and the 2-MP monochrome display in a visual grading analysis (VGA). Very small differences were found between the displays when reading the CDRAD images. The VGA scores were -0.28 for the color and -0.25 for the monochrome display (p = 0.24; NS). It thus seems possible to use color displays in diagnostic radiology provided that grayscale adjustment is used.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 121
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Effect of room illuminance on monitor black level luminance and monitor calibration [J].
Chakrabarti, K ;
Kaczmarek, RV ;
Thomas, JA ;
Romanyukha, A .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2003, 16 (04) :350-355
[2]   Personal computer versus workstation display: Observer performance in detection of wrist fractures on digital radiographs [J].
Doyle, AJ ;
Le Fevre, J ;
Anderson, GD .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (03) :872-877
[3]   Personal computer-based PACS display system: Comparison with a dedicated PACS workstation for review of computed radiographic images in rheumatoid arthritis [J].
Doyle, AJ ;
Gunn, MLD ;
Gamble, GD ;
Zhang, MJ .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (06) :646-653
[4]   Image quality vs radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study [J].
Geijer, H ;
Beckman, KW ;
Andersson, T ;
Persliden, J .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (09) :1704-1709
[5]   Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs [J].
Goo, JM ;
Choi, AY ;
Im, JG ;
Lee, HL ;
Chung, MJ ;
Han, DH ;
Park, SH ;
Kim, JH ;
Nam, SH .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :762-766
[6]   Optimization of a contrast-detail-based method for electronic image display quality evaluation [J].
Hangiandreou, NJ ;
Fetterly, KA ;
Felmlee, JP .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1999, 12 (02) :60-67
[7]   Influence of monitor luminance change on observer performance for detection of abnormalities depicted on chest radiographs [J].
Ikeda, M ;
Ishigaki, T ;
Shimamoto, K ;
Kodera, Y ;
Koyama, S ;
Usami, H ;
Kato, K .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (01) :57-63
[8]   Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search [J].
Krupinski, E ;
Roehrig, H ;
Furukawa, T .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1999, 6 (07) :411-418
[9]   Pulmonary nodule detection and visual search: P45 and P104 monochrome versus color monitor displays [J].
Krupinski, EA ;
Roehrig, H .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (06) :638-645
[10]   Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images [J].
Krupinski, EA ;
Johnson, J ;
Roehrig, H ;
Nafziger, J ;
Fan, JH ;
Lubin, J .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2004, 17 (04) :258-263