Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma

被引:64
作者
Salvetat, Maria L.
Zeppieri, Marco
Tosoni, Claudia
Brusini, Paolo
机构
[1] Santa Maria Misericordia Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[2] Univ Udine, Dept Ophthalmol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[3] Denvers Eye Inst, Portland, OR USA
来源
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA | 2007年 / 85卷 / 03期
关键词
tonometry; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Pascal dynamic contour tonometry; TonoPen; central corneal thickness; primary open-angle glaucoma;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00834.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken with Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), the TonoPen and the Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements taken with Pascal DCT and the TonoPen was evaluated. One eye in each of 101 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) underwent ultrasonic CCT measurement and IOP evaluation with GAT, Pascal DCT and the TonoPen in random order. The agreement between results from Pascal DCT and the TonoPen and those of GAT was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. The deviation of Pascal DCT and TonoPen readings from GAT values, corrected for CCT, was calculated and correlated to CCT using a linear regression model. The mean of the differences in IOP measurements was 3.2 +/- 2.4 mmHg for Pascal DCT minus GAT readings and 0.5 +/- 4.5 mmHg for TonoPen minus GAT readings. The 95% confidence interval of differences in IOP measurements was higher between TonoPen and GAT readings (- 6 to 7 mmHg) than between Pascal and GAT readings (0.1-6.8 mmHg). Pascal DCT significantly overestimated IOP compared with GAT, especially for higher IOP readings. Bland-Altman scatterplots showed reasonable inter-method agreement between Pascal DCT and GAT measurements, and poor agreement between TonoPen and GAT measurements. The deviations of Pascal DCT and TonoPen readings from the corrected GAT values were both highly correlated with CCT values (linear regression analysis, p < 0.0001). The mean change in measured IOP for a 10-mu m increase in CCT was 0.48 mmHg for Pascal DCT and 0.74 mmHg for the TonoPen. Agreement with GAT measurements was higher for Pascal DCT than for TonoPen readings; however, Pascal DCT significantly overestimated IOP values compared with GAT. Measurements of IOP obtained with both Pascal DCT and the TonoPen appeared to be influenced by CCT, and this influence appeared to be greater for the latter.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 279
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry According to the International Ocular Tonometer Standards ISO 8612 in Glaucoma Patients
    Pahlitzsch, M.
    Gonnermann, J.
    Maier, A. K. B.
    Schwenteck, T.
    Torun, N.
    Bertelmann, E.
    Klamann, M. K.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2014, 231 (11) : 1107 - 1113
  • [42] Factors Influencing Intermethod Agreement Between Goldmann Applanation, Pascal Dynamic Contour, and Ocular Response Analyzer Tonometry
    Sullivan-Mee, Michael
    Lewis, Sarah E.
    Pensyl, Denise
    Gerhardt, Gretchen
    Halverson, Kathy D.
    Qualls, Clifford
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (06) : 487 - 495
  • [43] Assessment of Factors Affecting the Difference in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Wang, Jing
    Cayer, Marie-Michelle
    Descovich, Denise
    Kamdeu-Fansi, Alvine
    Harasymowycz, Paul J.
    Li, Gisele
    Lesk, Mark R.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2011, 20 (08) : 482 - 487
  • [44] Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) - a comparison of agreement and reproducibility
    Herdener, Sonja
    Pache, Mona
    Lautebach, Sonja
    Funk, Jens
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 245 (07) : 1027 - 1030
  • [45] Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) - a comparison of agreement and reproducibility
    Sonja Herdener
    Mona Pache
    Sonja Lautebach
    Jens Funk
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2006, 245 : 1027 - 1030
  • [46] Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry -: a comparative study
    Johannesson, Gauti
    Hallberg, Per
    Eklund, Anders
    Linden, Christina
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2008, 86 (06) : 614 - 621
  • [47] Association of Ocular Hypotensive Medication Types with Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Measurements in a Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertensive Population
    Tzamalis, Argyrios
    Kynigopoulos, Myron
    Chalvatzis, Nikolaos
    Dimitrakos, Stavros
    Schlote, Torsten
    JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 29 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [48] IOP Measured by Dynamic Contour Tonometry Correlates With IOP Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Japanese Individuals
    Ito, Ken
    Tawara, Akihiko
    Kubota, Toshiaki
    Harada, Yukinori
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2012, 21 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [49] The effect of contact lens-induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry
    Oh, Jong-Hyun
    Yoo, Chungkwon
    Kim, Yong Yeon
    Kim, Hyo-Myung
    Song, Jong-Suk
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 247 (03) : 371 - 375
  • [50] Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK
    Shemesh, Gabi
    Soiberman, Uri
    Kurtz, Shimon
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 6 : 1967 - 1970