Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma

被引:64
作者
Salvetat, Maria L.
Zeppieri, Marco
Tosoni, Claudia
Brusini, Paolo
机构
[1] Santa Maria Misericordia Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[2] Univ Udine, Dept Ophthalmol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[3] Denvers Eye Inst, Portland, OR USA
来源
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA | 2007年 / 85卷 / 03期
关键词
tonometry; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Pascal dynamic contour tonometry; TonoPen; central corneal thickness; primary open-angle glaucoma;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00834.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken with Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), the TonoPen and the Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements taken with Pascal DCT and the TonoPen was evaluated. One eye in each of 101 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) underwent ultrasonic CCT measurement and IOP evaluation with GAT, Pascal DCT and the TonoPen in random order. The agreement between results from Pascal DCT and the TonoPen and those of GAT was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. The deviation of Pascal DCT and TonoPen readings from GAT values, corrected for CCT, was calculated and correlated to CCT using a linear regression model. The mean of the differences in IOP measurements was 3.2 +/- 2.4 mmHg for Pascal DCT minus GAT readings and 0.5 +/- 4.5 mmHg for TonoPen minus GAT readings. The 95% confidence interval of differences in IOP measurements was higher between TonoPen and GAT readings (- 6 to 7 mmHg) than between Pascal and GAT readings (0.1-6.8 mmHg). Pascal DCT significantly overestimated IOP compared with GAT, especially for higher IOP readings. Bland-Altman scatterplots showed reasonable inter-method agreement between Pascal DCT and GAT measurements, and poor agreement between TonoPen and GAT measurements. The deviations of Pascal DCT and TonoPen readings from the corrected GAT values were both highly correlated with CCT values (linear regression analysis, p < 0.0001). The mean change in measured IOP for a 10-mu m increase in CCT was 0.48 mmHg for Pascal DCT and 0.74 mmHg for the TonoPen. Agreement with GAT measurements was higher for Pascal DCT than for TonoPen readings; however, Pascal DCT significantly overestimated IOP values compared with GAT. Measurements of IOP obtained with both Pascal DCT and the TonoPen appeared to be influenced by CCT, and this influence appeared to be greater for the latter.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 279
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Corneal parameters and difference between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes
    Lanza, Michele
    Borrelli, Maria
    De Bernardo, Maddalena
    Filosa, Maria Luisa
    Rosa, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2008, 17 (06) : 460 - 464
  • [32] Comparative evaluation of TonoPen AVIA, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry
    Bhartiya S.
    Bali S.J.
    Sharma R.
    Chaturvedi N.
    Dada T.
    International Ophthalmology, 2011, 31 (4) : 297 - 302
  • [33] Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry in a population of Mexican open-angle glaucoma patients
    J. Jimenez-Roman
    F. Gil-Carrasco
    A. Martinez
    O. Albis-Donado
    J. D. De la Torre-Tovar
    International Ophthalmology, 2013, 33 : 221 - 225
  • [34] Goldmann Applanation Tonometry versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry after Vitrectomy with Silicone Oil Endotamponade
    Fuest, Matthias
    Mamas, Nikolaos
    Walter, Peter
    Mazinani, Babac E.
    Roessler, Gemot
    Plange, Niklas
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2017, 42 (07) : 1007 - 1012
  • [35] Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Herr, Anne
    Remky, Andreas
    Hirsch, Thalia
    Rennings, Corinna
    Plange, Niklas
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 7 : 815 - 819
  • [36] Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry After Treatment With Prostaglandin Analog/Prostamide
    Ang, Ghee Soon
    Wells, Anthony P.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2010, 19 (05) : 346 - 346
  • [37] Dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry: correlation with intracameral assessment of intraocular pressure
    Riva, Ivano
    Quaranta, Luciano
    Russo, Andrea
    Katsanos, Andreas
    Rulli, Eliana
    Floriani, Irene
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 22 (01) : 55 - 62
  • [38] Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and noncontact tonometry in ocular hypertension and glaucoma
    Erdurmus, M.
    Totan, Y.
    Hepsen, I. F.
    Yagci, R.
    EYE, 2009, 23 (03) : 663 - 668
  • [39] The influence of altitude on the differences between Goldmann tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry: An ecological meta-analysis
    Albis-Donado, Oscar
    Ramirez-Neria, Paulina
    Rios-Acosta, Nadia
    Stalmans, Ingeborg
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 72 (SUPPL 3) : S398 - S403
  • [40] Effect of Corneal Morphometry on Dynamic Contour and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Saenz-Frances, Federico
    Janez, Luis
    Borrego-Sanz, Lara
    Maria Martinez-de-la-Casa, Jose
    Jerez-Fidalgo, Maria
    Garcia-Sanchez, Julian
    Garcia-Feijoo, Julian
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (05) : 380 - 383