Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma

被引:64
作者
Salvetat, Maria L.
Zeppieri, Marco
Tosoni, Claudia
Brusini, Paolo
机构
[1] Santa Maria Misericordia Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[2] Univ Udine, Dept Ophthalmol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[3] Denvers Eye Inst, Portland, OR USA
来源
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA | 2007年 / 85卷 / 03期
关键词
tonometry; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Pascal dynamic contour tonometry; TonoPen; central corneal thickness; primary open-angle glaucoma;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00834.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken with Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), the TonoPen and the Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements taken with Pascal DCT and the TonoPen was evaluated. One eye in each of 101 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) underwent ultrasonic CCT measurement and IOP evaluation with GAT, Pascal DCT and the TonoPen in random order. The agreement between results from Pascal DCT and the TonoPen and those of GAT was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. The deviation of Pascal DCT and TonoPen readings from GAT values, corrected for CCT, was calculated and correlated to CCT using a linear regression model. The mean of the differences in IOP measurements was 3.2 +/- 2.4 mmHg for Pascal DCT minus GAT readings and 0.5 +/- 4.5 mmHg for TonoPen minus GAT readings. The 95% confidence interval of differences in IOP measurements was higher between TonoPen and GAT readings (- 6 to 7 mmHg) than between Pascal and GAT readings (0.1-6.8 mmHg). Pascal DCT significantly overestimated IOP compared with GAT, especially for higher IOP readings. Bland-Altman scatterplots showed reasonable inter-method agreement between Pascal DCT and GAT measurements, and poor agreement between TonoPen and GAT measurements. The deviations of Pascal DCT and TonoPen readings from the corrected GAT values were both highly correlated with CCT values (linear regression analysis, p < 0.0001). The mean change in measured IOP for a 10-mu m increase in CCT was 0.48 mmHg for Pascal DCT and 0.74 mmHg for the TonoPen. Agreement with GAT measurements was higher for Pascal DCT than for TonoPen readings; however, Pascal DCT significantly overestimated IOP values compared with GAT. Measurements of IOP obtained with both Pascal DCT and the TonoPen appeared to be influenced by CCT, and this influence appeared to be greater for the latter.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 279
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry
    S-Y Hsu
    M-M Sheu
    A-H Hsu
    K-Y Wu
    J-I Yeh
    J-N Tien
    R-K Tsai
    Eye, 2009, 23 : 1582 - 1588
  • [22] A Clinical Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry Versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Yalcinbayir, Ozgur
    Baykara, Mehmet
    Atasoy, Aydin
    Ozcetin, Hikmet
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING, 2010, 41 (04) : 437 - 442
  • [23] Evaluation of correction formulas for tonometry. The Goldmann applanation tonometry in approximation to dynamic contour tonometry
    Wachtl, J.
    Toeteberg-Harms, M.
    Frimmel, S.
    Kniestedt, C.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2017, 114 (08): : 716 - 721
  • [24] Intraocular pressure measurement - Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Schneider, E
    Grehn, F
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2006, 15 (01) : 2 - 6
  • [25] Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes
    P Ceruti
    R Morbio
    M Marraffa
    G Marchini
    Eye, 2009, 23 : 262 - 269
  • [26] A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy
    Afshin Lotfi Sadigh
    Rohollah F. Fouladi
    Hassan Hashemi
    Amir Houshang Beheshtnejad
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2013, 251 : 603 - 608
  • [27] Real-world comparison between the Tonopen and Goldmann applanation tonometry in a university glaucoma clinic
    Blumberg, Max J.
    Varikuti, Venkata N. V.
    Weiner, Asher
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 41 (05) : 1815 - 1825
  • [28] Real-world comparison between the Tonopen and Goldmann applanation tonometry in a university glaucoma clinic
    Max J. Blumberg
    Venkata N. V. Varikuti
    Asher Weiner
    International Ophthalmology, 2021, 41 : 1815 - 1825
  • [29] Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature
    Andreanos, Konstantinos
    Koutsandrea, Chryssanthi
    Papaconstantinou, Dimitris
    Diagourtas, Andreas
    Kotoulas, Andreas
    Dimitrakas, Panagiotis
    Moschos, Marilita M.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 2477 - 2484
  • [30] Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: challenging the gold standard
    Bochmann, Frank
    Kaufmann, Claude
    Thiel, Michael A.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 5 (06) : 743 - 749