Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma

被引:64
作者
Salvetat, Maria L.
Zeppieri, Marco
Tosoni, Claudia
Brusini, Paolo
机构
[1] Santa Maria Misericordia Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[2] Univ Udine, Dept Ophthalmol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[3] Denvers Eye Inst, Portland, OR USA
来源
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA | 2007年 / 85卷 / 03期
关键词
tonometry; Goldmann applanation tonometry; Pascal dynamic contour tonometry; TonoPen; central corneal thickness; primary open-angle glaucoma;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00834.x
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken with Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), the TonoPen and the Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements taken with Pascal DCT and the TonoPen was evaluated. One eye in each of 101 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) underwent ultrasonic CCT measurement and IOP evaluation with GAT, Pascal DCT and the TonoPen in random order. The agreement between results from Pascal DCT and the TonoPen and those of GAT was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. The deviation of Pascal DCT and TonoPen readings from GAT values, corrected for CCT, was calculated and correlated to CCT using a linear regression model. The mean of the differences in IOP measurements was 3.2 +/- 2.4 mmHg for Pascal DCT minus GAT readings and 0.5 +/- 4.5 mmHg for TonoPen minus GAT readings. The 95% confidence interval of differences in IOP measurements was higher between TonoPen and GAT readings (- 6 to 7 mmHg) than between Pascal and GAT readings (0.1-6.8 mmHg). Pascal DCT significantly overestimated IOP compared with GAT, especially for higher IOP readings. Bland-Altman scatterplots showed reasonable inter-method agreement between Pascal DCT and GAT measurements, and poor agreement between TonoPen and GAT measurements. The deviations of Pascal DCT and TonoPen readings from the corrected GAT values were both highly correlated with CCT values (linear regression analysis, p < 0.0001). The mean change in measured IOP for a 10-mu m increase in CCT was 0.48 mmHg for Pascal DCT and 0.74 mmHg for the TonoPen. Agreement with GAT measurements was higher for Pascal DCT than for TonoPen readings; however, Pascal DCT significantly overestimated IOP values compared with GAT. Measurements of IOP obtained with both Pascal DCT and the TonoPen appeared to be influenced by CCT, and this influence appeared to be greater for the latter.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 279
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice
    Halkiadakis, Ioannis
    Patsea, Eleni
    Chatzimichali, Katerina
    Skouriotis, Sotiris
    Chalkidou, Sonia
    Amariotakis, Georgios
    Papakonstadinou, Dimitrios
    Theodossiadis, George
    Amariotakis, Apostolos
    Georgopoulos, Gerasimos
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2009, 87 (03) : 323 - 328
  • [2] Clinical comparison of Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma
    Sullivan-Mee, Michael
    Halverson, Kathy D.
    Qualls, Clifford
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2007, 16 (08) : 694 - 699
  • [3] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements With Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, Tonopen XL, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Patients With Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Yildiz, Izlem
    Altan, Cigdem
    Cakmak, Semih
    Genc, Selim
    Yildirim, Yusuf
    Agca, Alper
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2022, 31 (11) : 909 - 914
  • [4] Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study
    Pache, M
    Wilmsmeyer, S
    Lautebach, S
    Funk, J
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 243 (08) : 763 - 767
  • [5] Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Keratoconus
    Unterlauft, Jan Darius
    Schaedle, Nina
    Kasper, Karsten
    Klink, Thomas
    Geerling, Gerd
    CORNEA, 2011, 30 (10) : 1078 - 1082
  • [6] Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study
    Mona Pache
    Sonja Wilmsmeyer
    Sonja Lautebach
    Jens Funk
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2005, 243 : 763 - 767
  • [7] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    J Y F Ku
    H V Danesh-Meyer
    J P Craig
    G D Gamble
    C N J McGhee
    Eye, 2006, 20 : 191 - 198
  • [8] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Ku, JYF
    Danesh-Meyer, HV
    Craig, JP
    Gamble, GD
    McGhee, CNJ
    EYE, 2006, 20 (02) : 191 - 198
  • [9] Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma
    Wachtl, Josephine
    Toteberg-Harms, Marc
    Frimmel, Sonja
    Roos, Malgorzata
    Kniestedt, Christoph
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 135 (06) : 601 - 608
  • [10] Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry following penetrating keratoplasty
    Kandarakis, Artemios
    Soumplis, Vasileios
    Pitsas, Christos
    Kandarakis, Stylianos
    Halikias, Jiannis
    Karagiannis, Dimitrios
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2010, 45 (05): : 489 - 493