Evaluation of a national neurosurgical formative examination: the UK experience

被引:3
作者
Anderson, Ian [1 ]
Corns, Robert [1 ]
Thomson, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Gen Infirm, Dept Neurosurg, G Floor,Jubilee Bldg, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Basic neurosciences training; higher speciality training; junior doctors; examination; ONLINE QUIZZES; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1080/02688697.2018.1476672
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Formative assessment is a key component in medical education and that it is a helpful process for all involved. Until recently there was no national formative examination for neurosurgical trainees. The Neurosurgery Annual in Training Examination (NAiTE) is an annual online, formative assessment that was introduced in 2014. In this paper, we seek to discuss how well NAiTE relates to established educational practice and principles and its fitness for purpose by discussing its rationale, structure and utility. Methods: A national online examination was introduced in 2014. The NAiTE consists of 100 single best answer multiple choice questions. The examination and questions with were reviewed and the global results presented. The existing literature and educational theory are used to guide subjective assessment of the process. Results: In 2016, 191 candidates participated in the NAiTE, of whom 154 were trainees working in UK neurosurgical units. The mean score for early stage UK trainees (years 1-3) was 52.4%, intermediate (years 4-5) 58.5% and senior (years 6-8) 65.4%. The NAiTE was found to be a reliable (Cronbach-Alpha of 0.89) and valid assessment of trainees with scores approximating those attained in the Intercollegiate Specialty Examination itself. Discussion: Potential areas for improvement are highlighted, including reference to some that have already been implemented. Conclusion: Overall, the examination is a cheap, viable and reliable means of testing trainees and encouraging their onward development and learning as they work towards the Intercollegiate Specialty Examination
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 272
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Abdel-Hameed AA, 2005, SAUDI MED J, V26, P1505
[2]   The role of assessment in expanding professional horizons [J].
Ben-David, MF .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2000, 22 (05) :472-477
[3]   A remedial intervention linked to a formative assessment is effective in terms of improving student performance in subsequent degree examinations [J].
Cleland, Jennifer ;
Mackenzie, R. K. ;
Ross, S. ;
Sinclair, H. K. ;
Lee, A. J. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2010, 32 (04) :E185-E190
[4]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[5]   The use of formative online quizzes to enhance class preparation and scores on summative exams [J].
Dobson, John L. .
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2008, 32 (04) :297-302
[6]   Medical education - Assessment in medical education [J].
Epstein, Ronald M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (04) :387-396
[7]  
Frisbie DA., 1988, Educational Measurement: Issues Pract, V7, P25, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1988.TB00422.X, 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1988.tb00422.x]
[8]   Use of unsupervised online quizzes as formative assessment in a medical physiology course: effects of incentives on student participation and performance [J].
Kibble, Jonathan .
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2007, 31 (03) :253-260
[9]   Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice [J].
Nicol, DJ ;
Macfarlane-Dick, D .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 31 (02) :199-218
[10]   The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice [J].
Roediger, Henry L., III ;
Karpicke, Jeffrey D. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 1 (03) :181-210