Effects of miniscrew orientation on implant stability and resistance to failure

被引:43
作者
Pickard, Michael B.
Dechow, Paul [2 ]
Rossouw, P. Emile [1 ]
Buschang, Peter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Baylor Coll Dent, Dept Orthodont, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Baylor Coll Dent, Dept Biomed Sci, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
RIGID ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS; OSSEOINTEGRATED TITANIUM IMPLANTS; ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE; FORCE APPLICATION; SCREW FIXATION; HOLDING POWER; BONE; CLINICIAN; SYSTEMS; TORQUE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.034
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of miniscrew implant orientation on the resistance to failure at the implant-bone interface. Methods: Miniscrew implants (IMTEC, Ardmore, Okla) were placed in 9 human cadaver mandibles, oriented at either 90 degrees or 45 degrees to the bone surface, and tested to failure in pull-out (tensile) and shear tests. The line of applied force and the orientation of the implants aligned at 45 degrees were either parallel or perpendicular to the maximum axis of bone stiffness. In the shear tests, the implants aligned at 45 degrees were angled toward and opposing the axis of shear force. Results: The implants aligned at 90 degrees had the highest force at failure of all the groups (342 +/- 80.9 N; P < 0.001). In the shear tests, the implants that were angled in the same direction as the line of force were the most stable and had the highest force at failure (253 +/- 74.05 N; P < 0.001). The implants angled away from the direction of force were the least stable and had the lowest force (87 +/- 27.2 N) at failure. Conclusions: The more closely the long axis of the implant approximates the line of applied force, the greater the stability of the implant and the greater its resistance to failure. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137:91-9)
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 99
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   A 15-YEAR STUDY OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS IN THE TREATMENT OF THE EDENTULOUS JAW [J].
ADELL, R ;
LEKHOLM, U ;
ROCKLER, B ;
BRANEMARK, PI .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1981, 10 (06) :387-416
[2]  
Boyle J M 3rd, 1993, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V8, P129
[3]   TORQUE AND PULLOUT ANALYSIS OF 6 CURRENTLY AVAILABLE SELF-TAPPING AND EMERGENCY SCREWS [J].
BOYLE, JM ;
FROST, DE ;
FOLEY, WL ;
GRADY, JJ .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1993, 51 (01) :45-50
[4]  
BRANEMARK P I, 1969, Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, V3, P81
[5]   MICROCIRCULATORY STUDIES IN MAN BY HIGH RESOLUTION VITAL MICROSCOPY [J].
BRANEMARK, PI ;
BREINE, U ;
ASPEGREN, K .
ANGIOLOGY, 1964, 15 (08) :329-+
[6]   Implant design and interface force transfer - A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis [J].
Cehreli, M ;
Duyck, J ;
De Cooman, M ;
Puers, R ;
Naert, I .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (02) :249-257
[7]   Stability consideration for internal maxillary distractors [J].
Cheung, LK ;
Zhang, Q ;
Wong, MCM ;
Wong, LLS .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 31 (03) :142-148
[8]  
Costa A, 1998, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V13, P201
[9]  
DECHOW PC, 1994, AM J PHYS ANTHR S, V22, P94
[10]  
DOUGLAS J B, 1987, Journal of Oral Implantology, V13, P28