Government subsidies for preventing supply disruption when the supplier has an outside option under competition

被引:23
作者
Guo, Yan [1 ]
Yu, Xinning [2 ]
Zhou, Caifeng [1 ]
Lyu, Gaoyan [3 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Dept Math & Phys, Baoding 071003, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Key Res Inst Humanities & Social Sci Univ, Res Ctr Contemporary Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Macau, Fac Business Adm, Taipa, Macau, Peoples R China
关键词
Government subsidy; Capacity constraint; Competition; External market; Social welfare; CONSUMER SUBSIDIES; ORDER ALLOCATION; CHAIN; PRICE; DEMAND; OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; SELECTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tre.2020.102218
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To prevent supply a disruption caused by capacity constraints and outside options, the government needs to offer subsidies. The following two types of subsidies are investigated: subsidies to the supplier (Mode S) and subsidies to the manufacturers (Mode M). Our analysis reveals that government subsidy strategies depend on the size of the external price and the capacity. Interestingly, Mode M (manufacturer subsidy) is superior to Mode S (supplier subsidy). Moreover, subsidizing both the supplier and manufacturers simultaneously is not superior to a single subsidy mode. Furthermore, the social welfare in the competitive case is not worse than that in the monopoly case under certain conditions. However, neither subsidy mode can prevent supply disruptions under scenarios of higher intensity of competition.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [31] On the Effectiveness of Uniform Subsidies in Increasing Market Consumption
    Levi, Retsef
    Perakis, Georgia
    Romero, Gonzalo
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 63 (01) : 40 - 57
  • [32] Government incentive impacts on private investment behaviors under demand uncertainty
    Li, Shuai
    Cai, Hubo
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2017, 101 : 115 - 129
  • [33] Market price uncertainty, risk aversion and procurement: Combining contracts and open market sourcing alternatives
    Mahapatra, Santosh
    Levental, Shlomo
    Narasimhan, Ram
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2017, 185 : 34 - 51
  • [34] Did Europe Move in the Right Direction on E-waste Legislation?
    Mazahir, Shumail
    Verter, Vedat
    Boyaci, Tamer
    Van Wassenhove, Luk N.
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 28 (01) : 121 - 139
  • [35] Capacity vs energy subsidies for promoting renewable investment: Benefits and costs for the EU power market
    Ozdemir, Ozge
    Hobbs, Benjamin F.
    van Hout, Marit
    Koutstaal, Paul R.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 137
  • [36] Compensating for Dynamic Supply Disruptions: Backup Flexibility Design
    Saghafian, Soroush
    Van Oyen, Mark P.
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 64 (02) : 390 - 405
  • [37] PRICE AND QUANTITY COMPETITION IN A DIFFERENTIATED DUOPOLY
    SINGH, N
    VIVES, X
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1984, 15 (04) : 546 - 554
  • [38] Donor Product-Subsidies to Increase Consumption: Implications of Consumer Awareness and Profit-Maximizing Intermediaries
    Taylor, Terry A.
    Xiao, Wenqiang
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 28 (07) : 1757 - 1772
  • [39] Resilient supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks
    Torabi, S. A.
    Baghersad, M.
    Mansouri, S. A.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2015, 79 : 22 - 48
  • [40] U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2019, DEADL APPR REG KEY D