Government subsidies for preventing supply disruption when the supplier has an outside option under competition

被引:23
作者
Guo, Yan [1 ]
Yu, Xinning [2 ]
Zhou, Caifeng [1 ]
Lyu, Gaoyan [3 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Dept Math & Phys, Baoding 071003, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Key Res Inst Humanities & Social Sci Univ, Res Ctr Contemporary Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Macau, Fac Business Adm, Taipa, Macau, Peoples R China
关键词
Government subsidy; Capacity constraint; Competition; External market; Social welfare; CONSUMER SUBSIDIES; ORDER ALLOCATION; CHAIN; PRICE; DEMAND; OPTIMIZATION; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; SELECTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.tre.2020.102218
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To prevent supply a disruption caused by capacity constraints and outside options, the government needs to offer subsidies. The following two types of subsidies are investigated: subsidies to the supplier (Mode S) and subsidies to the manufacturers (Mode M). Our analysis reveals that government subsidy strategies depend on the size of the external price and the capacity. Interestingly, Mode M (manufacturer subsidy) is superior to Mode S (supplier subsidy). Moreover, subsidizing both the supplier and manufacturers simultaneously is not superior to a single subsidy mode. Furthermore, the social welfare in the competitive case is not worse than that in the monopoly case under certain conditions. However, neither subsidy mode can prevent supply disruptions under scenarios of higher intensity of competition.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 51 条