Evaluating Women With Ovarian Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations Missed Opportunities

被引:107
作者
Meyer, Larissa A.
Anderson, Meaghan E.
Lacour, Robin A.
Suri, Anuj
Daniels, Molly S.
Urbauer, Diana L.
Nogueras-Gonzalez, Graciela M.
Schmeler, Kathleen M.
Gershenson, David M.
Lu, Karen H.
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas Mem Hermann, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Quantitat Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; SEQUENCE-ANALYSIS; RISK; SUSCEPTIBILITY; PREVALENCE; FEATURES; PENETRANCE; SURVIVAL; SERIES;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181da08d7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of genetic counseling referral for ovarian cancer patients who are at substantial risk for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. METHODS: An analysis was performed of new ovarian cancer patients who were seen at a comprehensive cancer center from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2007. Patients at substantial (more than 20-25%) risk for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were identified and records reviewed for referral to genetic counseling. Time to referral was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 3,765 epithelial ovarian cancer patients were seen during the 9-year period. On average, 23.8% of patients met substantial-risk criteria for BRCA mutations. In 1999, only 12% of patients at substantial-risk were referred. Referral improved over time with 48% referred in 2007 (P<.001). Newly diagnosed patients were more often referred for genetic counseling than new patients with recurrent disease or those seen as second opinions. African-American women meeting substantial-risk criteria were less likely to be referred than were white or Hispanic women (P=.009). CONCLUSION: Although dictated family history was accurate, interpretation of risk for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and subsequent referral to genetic counseling was poor. Although there was significant improvement over time, 50% of substantial-risk patients still were missed. Systematic efforts to identify those ovarian cancer patients at substantial risk for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 are necessary. (Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:945-52)
引用
收藏
页码:945 / 952
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Antoniou AC, 2000, GENET EPIDEMIOL, V18, P173
[2]  
Ben David Y, 2002, J CLIN ONCOL, V20, P463, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.2.463
[3]   Clinicopathologic features of BRCA-linked and sporadic ovarian cancer [J].
Boyd, J ;
Sonoda, Y ;
Federici, MG ;
Bogomolniy, F ;
Rhei, E ;
Maresco, DL ;
Saigo, PE ;
Almadrones, LA ;
Barakat, RR ;
Brown, CL ;
Chi, DS ;
Curtin, JP ;
Poynor, EA ;
Hoskins, WJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (17) :2260-2265
[4]   WOMENS RECEPTIVITY TO TESTING FOR A GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TO BREAST-CANCER [J].
CHALIKI, H ;
LOADER, S ;
LEVENKRON, JC ;
LOGANYOUNG, W ;
HALL, WJ ;
ROWLEY, PT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (08) :1133-1135
[5]  
Claus EB, 1996, CANCER, V77, P2318, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2318::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-Z
[7]   BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer [J].
Couch, FJ ;
DeShano, ML ;
Blackwood, MA ;
Calzone, K ;
Stopfer, J ;
Campeau, L ;
Ganguly, A ;
Rebbeck, T ;
Weber, BL ;
Jablon, L ;
Cobleigh, MA ;
Hoskins, K ;
Garber, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (20) :1409-1415
[8]  
*CTR MED MED SERV, LCD GEN TEST L24308
[9]  
Durfy SJ, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P369
[10]   Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2:: Correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer risk [J].
Frank, TS ;
Manley, SA ;
Olopade, OI ;
Cummings, S ;
Garber, JE ;
Bernhardt, B ;
Antman, K ;
Russo, D ;
Wood, ME ;
Mullineau, L ;
Isaacs, C ;
Peshkin, B ;
Buys, S ;
Venne, V ;
Rowley, PT ;
Loader, S ;
Offit, K ;
Robson, M ;
Hampel, H ;
Brener, D ;
Winer, EP ;
Clark, S ;
Weber, B ;
Strong, LC ;
Rieger, P ;
McClure, M ;
Ward, BE ;
Shattuck-Eidens, D ;
Oliphant, A ;
Skolnick, MH ;
Thomas, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (07) :2417-2425