Analysis of gene expression in response to water deficit of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties differing in drought tolerance

被引:74
作者
Jain, Deepti [1 ]
Chattopadhyay, Debasis [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Plant Genome Res, New Delhi 110067, India
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
HIGH-SALINITY STRESSES; SALT-STRESS; ABIOTIC STRESS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; CDNA MICROARRAY; LOW-TEMPERATURE; RICE GENOTYPES; COLD; DEHYDRATION; PROLINE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2229-10-24
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Background: Chickpea (C. arietinum L.) ranks third in food legume crop production in the world. However, drought poses a serious threat to chickpea production, and development of drought-resistant varieties is a necessity. Unfortunately, cultivated chickpea has a high morphological but narrow genetic diversity, and understanding the genetic processes of this plant is hindered by the fact that the chickpea genome has not yet been sequenced and its EST resources are limited. In this study, two chickpea varieties having contrasting levels of drought-tolerance were analyzed for differences in transcript profiling during drought stress treatment by withdrawal of irrigation at different time points. Transcript profiles of ESTs derived from subtractive cDNA libraries constructed with RNA from whole seedlings of both varieties were analyzed at different stages of stress treatment. Results: A series of comparisons of transcript abundance between two varieties at different time points were made. 319 unique ESTs available from different libraries were categorized into eleven clusters according to their comparative expression profiles. Expression analysis revealed that 70% of the ESTs were more than two fold abundant in the tolerant cultivar at any point of the stress treatment of which expression of 33% ESTs were more than two fold high even under the control condition. 53 ESTs that displayed very high fold relative expression in the tolerant variety were screened for further analysis. These ESTs were clustered in four groups according to their expression patterns. Conclusions: Annotation of the highly expressed ESTs in the tolerant cultivar predicted that most of them encoded proteins involved in cellular organization, protein metabolism, signal transduction, and transcription. Results from this study may help in targeting useful genes for improving drought tolerance in chickpea.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Ahmad F, 2005, GEN RESOUR CHROM ENG, V1, P187
[2]   SOS2 promotes salt tolerance in part by interacting with the vacuolar H+-ATPase and upregulating its transport activity [J].
Batelli, Giorgia ;
Verslues, Paul E. ;
Agius, Fernanda ;
Qiu, Quansheng ;
Fujii, Hiroaki ;
Pan, Songqin ;
Schumaker, Karen S. ;
Grillo, Stefania ;
Zhu, Jian-Kang .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 2007, 27 (22) :7781-7790
[3]   RAPID DETERMINATION OF FREE PROLINE FOR WATER-STRESS STUDIES [J].
BATES, LS ;
WALDREN, RP ;
TEARE, ID .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1973, 39 (01) :205-207
[4]   Comparative proteomics analysis of differentially expressed proteins in chickpea extracellular matrix during dehydration stress [J].
Bhushan, Deepti ;
Pandey, Aarti ;
Choudhary, Mani Kant ;
Datta, Asis ;
Chakraborty, Subhra ;
Chakraborty, Niranjan .
MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2007, 6 (11) :1868-1884
[5]   Long term transcript accumulation during the development of dehydration adaptation in Cicer arietinum [J].
Boominathan, P ;
Shukla, R ;
Kumar, A ;
Manna, D ;
Negi, D ;
Verma, PK ;
Chattopadhyay, D .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 135 (03) :1608-1620
[6]   Molecular and physiological responses to water deficit in drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive lines of sunflower -: Accumulation of dehydrin transcripts correlates with tolerance [J].
Cellier, F ;
Conéjéro, G ;
Breitler, JC ;
Casse, F .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 116 (01) :319-328
[7]  
Chakraborty Niranjan, 2007, V365, P287
[8]   Salt-responsive genes in rice revealed by cDNA microarray analysis [J].
Chao, DY ;
Luo, YH ;
Shi, M ;
Luo, D ;
Lin, HX .
CELL RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (10) :796-810
[9]   Transcriptional profiling reveals novel interactions between wounding, pathogen, abiotic stress, and hormonal responses in Arabidopsis [J].
Cheong, YH ;
Chang, HS ;
Gupta, R ;
Wang, X ;
Zhu, T ;
Luan, S .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 129 (02) :661-677
[10]   Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance [J].
Cushman, JC ;
Bohnert, HJ .
CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2000, 3 (02) :117-124