Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, for the Characterization of Lesions Identified on Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate

被引:53
作者
Purysko, Andrei S. [1 ]
Bittencourt, Leonardo K. [2 ]
Bullen, Jennifer A. [3 ]
Mostardeiro, Thomaz R. [4 ]
Herts, Brian R. [1 ]
Klein, Eric A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Imaging Inst, Abdominal Imaging Sect, 9500 Euclid Ave,Mail Code JB 3, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] DASA, CDPI Clin, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[5] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
MRI; multiparametric MRI; prostate cancer; Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS); PI-RADS V2; CANCER DETECTION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.16.17289
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to measure the accuracy and interobserver agreement of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, version 2 (PI-RADSv2), for the characterization of prostate lesions on multiparametric MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study included 170 men examined at a single institution between August 2014 and February 2015 on a 3-T MRI scanner. Study patients were found to have lesions concerning for prostate cancer that were targeted for MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy. Two experienced readers independently assigned a PI-RADSv2 assessment category to the dominant lesion in each patient. The AUC was calculated to determine reader accuracy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score >= 3 + 4). The Cohen kappa statistic was used to quantify interobserver agreement. RESULTS. The prevalence of clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.36 (61/170 patients). The AUCs for readers 1 and 2 were 0.871 and 0.882, respectively. The AUCs were greater for peripheral zone lesions than for transition zone lesions. When a PI-RADSv2 assessment category >= 3 was considered positive, the agreement between readers was good overall (kappa = 0.63) and was fair for transition zone lesions (kappa = 0.53). When a PI-RADSv2 assessment category >= 4 was considered positive, the agreement was excellent overall (kappa = 0.91) and was excellent for both peripheral zone lesions (kappa = 0.91) and transition zone lesions (kappa = 0.87). CONCLUSION. Two experienced readers were able to accurately identify patients with clinically significant prostate cancer using PI-RADSv2 with good interobserver agreement overall.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 345
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Validation of PI-RADS v.2 for prostate cancer diagnosis with MRI at 3T using an external phased-array coil
    Baldisserotto, Matteo
    Dornelles Neto, Eurico J.
    Carvalhal, Gustavo
    de Toledo, Aloyso F.
    de Almeida, Clovis M.
    Cairoli, Carlos E. D.
    de Silva, Daniel O.
    Carvalhal, Eduardo
    Paganin, Ricardo P.
    Agra, Alexandre
    de Santos, Francisco S.
    Noronha, Jorge A. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (05) : 1354 - 1359
  • [2] Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Verma, Sadhna
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Shtern, Faina
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Margolis, Daniel
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Cornud, Francois
    Choyke, Peter L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [3] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [4] Accuracy of Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Meta-Analysis
    de Rooij, Maarten
    Hamoen, Esther H. J.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (02) : 343 - 351
  • [5] Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis
    Hamoen, Esther H. J.
    de Rooij, Maarten
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Rovers, Maroeska M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (06) : 1112 - 1121
  • [6] Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Kasel-Seibert, Moritz
    Lehmann, Thomas
    Aschenbach, Rene
    Guettler, Felix V.
    Abubrig, Mohamed
    Grimm, Marc-Oliver
    Teichgraeber, Ulf
    Franiel, Tobias
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (04) : 726 - 731
  • [7] Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection
    Mertan, Francesca V.
    Greer, Matthew D.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    George, Arvin K.
    Kongnyuy, Michael
    Muthigi, Akhil
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (03) : 690 - 696
  • [8] Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging
    Muller, Berrend G.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Sankineni, Sandeep
    Marko, Jamie
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    George, Arvin Koruthu
    de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 277 (03) : 741 - 750
  • [9] Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers
    Park, Sung Yoon
    Jung, Dae Chul
    Oh, Young Taik
    Cho, Nam Hoon
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Hong, Sung Joon
    Han, Kyunghwa
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2016, 280 (01) : 108 - 116
  • [10] Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS vl
    Polanec, Stephan
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Bickel, Hubert
    Pinker-Domenig, Katja
    Georg, Dietmar
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Aulitzky, Wolfgang
    Susani, Martin
    Baltzer, Pascal A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (06) : 1125 - 1131