Occupational and patient radiation doses in a modern cardiac electrophysiology laboratory

被引:10
作者
Wunderle, Kevin A. [1 ]
Chung, Mina K. [2 ]
Rayadurgam, Sripriya [3 ]
Miller, Mark A. [3 ]
Obuchowski, Nancy A. [4 ]
Lindsay, Bruce D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Radiol, 25900 Sci Pk Dr,AC211, Beachwood, OH 44122 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Dept Radiat Safety, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Radiation; Radiation dose; Occupational dose; Patient dose; RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION; EXPERT CONSENSUS DOCUMENT; IMAGING-BEST PRACTICES; CARDIOLOGY TASK-FORCE; IONIZING-RADIATION; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; FLUOROSCOPY; PROTECTION; EXPOSURE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-018-0462-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeTechnological advancements have greatly expanded the field of cardiac electrophysiology, requiring greater demands on imaging systems and potentially delivering higher radiation doses to patients and operators. With little contemporary research on occupational and patient radiation risk in the electrophysiology laboratory, the aim of this study was to analyze radiation doses, including occupational fetal doses, over approximately the last decade. We benchmarked the occupational data to our patient radiation dose data to allow for comparison and to put into perspective the associated radiation risks.MethodsOccupational radiation dosimetry analyzed included data from an 11-year period for physicians, a 7-year period for nurses, and a 9-year period for fetal doses. Patient-related dose metrics over an 8-year period were also analyzed.ResultsIn the physician and nursing groups, there was a nearly 70% decrease in the average occupational radiation doses over the given periods. Within the electrophysiology department, the average fetal occupational doses were very low, close to 0 mu Sv. The average reference point air kerma per patient for all electrophysiology procedures decreased from nearly 600 mGy/procedure in 2010 to just over 100 mGy/procedure in 2017.ConclusionsPatient and occupational radiation doses in our laboratories significantly decreased over the periods analyzed as a result of clinical and technical staff efforts as well as advances in imaging technology. The radiation-related risk to individuals working in our electrophysiology laboratories, including pregnant women, is very low. Data reported herein could be used by other institutions to evaluate their occupational and patient radiation safety practices.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 190
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HLTH RISKS EXP LOW L
[2]   CAPTURING PATIENT DOSES FROM FLUOROSCOPICALLY BASED DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL SYSTEMS [J].
Balter, Stephen .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 2008, 95 (05) :535-540
[3]   Patient Skin Reactions From Interventional Fluoroscopy Procedures [J].
Balter, Stephen ;
Miller, Donald L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (04) :W335-W342
[4]   RADIATION EXPOSURE DURING RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION OF ACCESSORY ATRIOVENTRICULAR CONNECTIONS [J].
CALKINS, H ;
NIKLASON, L ;
SOUSA, J ;
ELATASSI, R ;
LANGBERG, J ;
MORADY, F .
CIRCULATION, 1991, 84 (06) :2376-2382
[5]   X-Ray Exposure in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Retrospective Analysis in 8150 Patients Over 7 Years of Activity in a Modern, Large-Volume Laboratory [J].
Casella, Michela ;
Dello Russo, Antonio ;
Russo, Eleonora ;
Catto, Valentina ;
Pizzamiglio, Francesca ;
Zucchetti, Martina ;
Majocchi, Benedetta ;
Riva, Stefania ;
Vettor, Giulia ;
Dessanai, Maria Antonietta ;
Fassini, Gaetano ;
Moltrasio, Massimo ;
Tundo, Fabrizio ;
Vignati, Carlo ;
Conti, Sergio ;
Bonomi, Alice ;
Carbucicchio, Corrado ;
Di Biase, Luigi ;
Natale, Andrea ;
Tondo, Claudio .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2018, 7 (11)
[6]  
Cousins C., 2013, Annals of the ICRP, V42, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.09.001
[7]   The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography [J].
Cowen, A. R. ;
Davies, A. G. ;
Sivananthan, M. U. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 63 (10) :1073-1085
[8]   Head and Neck Radiation Dose and Radiation Safety for Interventional Physicians [J].
Fetterly, Kenneth ;
Schueler, Beth ;
Grams, Michael ;
Sturchio, Glenn ;
Bell, Malcolm ;
Gulati, Rajiv .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 10 (05) :520-528
[9]  
Fetterly Kenneth A, 2012, JACC Cardiovasc Interv, V5, P866, DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.003
[10]   APPROPRIATE USE OF EFFECTIVE DOSE IN RADIATION PROTECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT [J].
Fisher, Darrell R. ;
Fahey, Frederic H. .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 2017, 113 (02) :102-109