Viability of a human melanoma cell after single and combined treatment with fotemustine, dacarbazine, and proton irradiation

被引:9
作者
Petrovic, Ivan M.
Koricanac, Lela B.
Todorovic, Danijela V.
Ristic-Fira, Aleksandra M.
Valastro, Lucia M.
Privitera, Giuseppe
Cuttone, Giacomo
机构
[1] Vinca Inst Nucl Sci, Lab Mol Biol & Endocrinol, Belgrade 11001, Serbia
[2] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, LNS, I-95123 Catania, Italy
[3] Univ Catania, Inst Radiol & Radiat Oncol, I-95125 Catania, Italy
来源
SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION PATHWAYS, PT C: CELL SIGNALING IN HEALTH AND DISEASE | 2007年 / 1095卷
关键词
hTB140 melanoma cells; fotemustine; dacarbazine; proton irradiation; viability; cell survival;
D O I
10.1196/annals.1397.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Viability of human HTB140 melanoma cells after being exposed to fotemustine (FM) and dacarbazine (DTIC) as well as to proton irradiation was studied. Effects of 100 and 250 mu M drugs were assessed after incubation of 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. Irradiations were performed with 62 MeV therapeutic protons, delivering to the cell monolayer single doses of 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 Gy. Viability was evaluated 7 days after irradiation. Inactivation level was estimated using microtetrasolium (MTT) and sulforhodamine B (SRB) assays. Combined effects of each drug and protons, were carried out using the same drug concentrations. Proton doses applied were those used in therapy, that is, 12 and 16 Gy. With the increase of drug concentration or irradiation dose, level of cell inactivation reached approximately 60%, 48 h after drug treatment or 7 days after irradiation at 16 Gy. Considering the rate of drug concentrations used, as well as the level of doses applied, it appears that HTB140 cells are more resistant to proton irradiation than to alkylating agents tested. The combined treatment with FM or DTIC and protons did not show significant changes of cell viability as compared to the effects of single agents. Since the time point for measuring cumulative effects of drug and irradiation was 48 h post irradiation, it seems that the obtained level of viability could be attributed primarily to the effects of drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 164
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
ALLEY MC, 1988, CANCER RES, V48, P589
[2]  
Belli M, 2000, INT J RADIAT BIOL, V76, P831, DOI 10.1080/09553000050028995
[3]   INSTRUMENTATION FOR TREATMENT OF CANCER USING PROTON AND LIGHT-ION BEAMS [J].
CHU, WT ;
LUDEWIGT, BA ;
RENNER, TR .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1993, 64 (08) :2055-2122
[4]   Drug resistance in melanoma: Mechanisms, apoptosis, and new potential therapeutic targets [J].
Grossman, D ;
Altieri, DC .
CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2001, 20 (1-2) :3-11
[5]   PHENOTYPIC HETEROGENEITY OF MELANOMA - RELATION TO THE DIFFERENTIATION PROGRAM OF MELANOMA-CELLS [J].
HOUGHTON, AN ;
REAL, FX ;
DAVIS, LJ ;
CORDONCARDO, C ;
OLD, LJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1987, 165 (03) :812-829
[6]  
*IAEA, 2000, TECHN REP SER IAWA, P135
[7]   Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nitrosourea fotemustine: A French cancer centre multicentric study [J].
Iliadis, A ;
LaunayIliadis, MC ;
Lucas, C ;
Fety, R ;
Lokiec, F ;
Tranchand, B ;
Milano, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (03) :455-460
[8]   Dacarbazine-vindesine versus dacarbazine-vindesine-cisplatin in disseminated malignant melanoma.: A randomised phase III trial [J].
Jungnelius, U ;
Ringborg, U ;
Aamdal, S ;
Mattsson, J ;
Stierner, U ;
Ingvar, C ;
Malmström, P ;
Andersson, R ;
Karlsson, M ;
Willman, K ;
Wist, E ;
Bjelkengren, G ;
Westberg, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (09) :1368-1374
[9]  
Kinnaert E, 2000, RADIAT RES, V154, P497, DOI 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)154[0497:TDOPMT]2.0.CO
[10]  
2