Scaption kinematics of reverse shoulder arthroplasty do not change after the sixth postoperative month

被引:5
作者
Matsuki, Keisuke [1 ,2 ]
Sugaya, Hiroyuki [2 ]
Hoshika, Shota [2 ]
Takahashi, Norimasa [2 ]
Kenmoku, Tomonori [1 ,3 ]
Banks, Scott A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, 330 MAE A,POB 116250, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Funabashi Orthopaed Sports Med & Joint Ctr, 1-833 Hazama, Funabashi, Chiba 2740822, Japan
[3] Kitasato Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Minami Ku, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520375, Japan
关键词
Kinematics; Shoulder; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Model-image registration techniques; Shoulder function; Time-course change; CUFF; MOTION; REPLACEMENT; PROSTHESIS; FLUOROSCOPY; IMPINGEMENT; ABDUCTION; RUPTURE; RANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.07.005
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Changes over time in shoulder kinematics and function after reverse shoulder arthroplasty have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare shoulder kinematics and function at 6 months and 1 year after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: Twenty patients with a mean age of 74 years (range, 63-91 years) were enrolled in this study. Fluoroscopic images during scapular plane elevation were recorded at the mean of 6 months (range, 5-8 months) and 14 months (range, 11-21 months). CT-derived glenosphere models and computer-aided design humeral implant models were matched with the silhouette of the implants in the fluoroscopic images using model-image registration techniques. Glenosphere and humeral implant kinematics during scaption were compared between the two time points. Patients were also clinically examined with active range of motion and Constant score, and postoperative improvement in shoulder function were assessed. Results: Active flexion and Constant score improved after surgery (p < 0.001 for both), but there was no significant improvement after six months. There was no significant improvement in active external rotation at either postoperative exam. There were no significant differences in glenosphere or humeral kinematics between six months and one year. Interpretation: There was no significant additional improvement in either shoulder kinematics during scapular plane elevation or function between the sixth and twelfth postoperative months. We can assess kinematics at six months after reverse shoulder arthroplasty to determine how the shoulder will move. Clinically, treatment in the first six postoperative months should be emphasized to achieve better surgical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Kinematic and clinical evaluation of shoulder function after primary and revision reverse shoulder prostheses
    Alta, Tjarco D.
    Bergmann, Jeroen H.
    Veeger, Dirk Jan
    Janssen, Thomas W.
    Burger, Bart J.
    Scholtes, Vanessa A.
    Willems, W. Jaap
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2011, 20 (04) : 564 - 570
  • [2] The active and passive kinematic difference between primary reverse and total shoulder prostheses
    Alta, Tjarco D. W.
    de Toledo, Joelly M.
    Veeger, H. E.
    Janssen, Thomas W. J.
    Willems, W. Jaap
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (09) : 1395 - 1402
  • [3] Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy
    Banks, SA
    Hodge, WA
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 43 (06) : 638 - 649
  • [4] Measuring dynamic in-vivo glenohumeral joint kinematics: Technique and preliminary results
    Bey, Michael J.
    Kline, Stephanie K.
    Zauel, Roger
    Lock, Terrence R.
    Kolowich, Patricia A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2008, 41 (03) : 711 - 714
  • [5] Grammont reverse prosthesis: Design, rationale, and biomechanics
    Boileau, P
    Watkinson, DJ
    Hatzidakis, AM
    Balg, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2005, 14 (01) : 147S - 161S
  • [6] Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: Results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty
    Boileau, Pascal
    Watkinson, Duncan
    Hatzidakis, Armodios M.
    Hovorka, Istvan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2006, 15 (05) : 527 - 540
  • [7] An in vivo kinematic study of the reverse shoulder joint replacement
    Chisholm, Carl
    Poon, Peter C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2012, 22 (08) : 655 - 660
  • [8] Biomechanical evaluation of different designs of glenospheres in the SMR reverse total shoulder prosthesis: Range of motion and risk of scapular notching
    Chou, Justin
    Malak, Sharif F.
    Anderson, Iain A.
    Astley, Tim
    Poon, Peter C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2009, 18 (03) : 354 - 359
  • [9] CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160
  • [10] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency
    Cuff, Derek
    Pupello, Derek
    Virani, Nazeem
    Levy, Jonathan
    Frankle, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (06) : 1244 - 1251