Development of an Implementation Process Model: a Delphi study

被引:13
作者
Parker, Gillian [1 ]
Kastner, Monika [1 ,2 ]
Born, Karen [1 ]
Berta, Whitney [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, 155 Coll St,4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
[2] North York Gen Hosp, Ctr Res & Innovat, 4001 Leslie St, Toronto, ON M2K 1E1, Canada
关键词
Delphi; Implementation; Process; Model; Evidence-based; Health services research; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; INTERVENTIONS; FRAMEWORK; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-021-06501-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThere is general scarcity of research on key elements of implementation processes and the factors which impact implementation success. Implementation of healthcare interventions is a complex process. Tools to support implementation can facilitate this process and improve effectiveness of the interventions and clinical outcomes. Understanding the impact of implementation support tools is a critical aspect of this process. The objective of this study was to solicit knowledge and agreement from relevant implementation science and knowledge translation healthcare experts in order to develop a process model of key elements in the implementation process.MethodsA two round, modified Delphi study involving international experts in knowledge translation and implementation (researchers, scientists, professors, decision-makers) was conducted. Participants rated and commented on all aspects of the process model, including the organization, content, scope, and structure. Delphi questions rated at 75% agreement or lower were reviewed and revised. Qualitative comments supported the restructuring and refinement. A second-round survey followed the same process as Round 1.ResultsFifty-four experts participated in Round 1, and 32 experts participated in Round 2. Twelve percent (n=6) of the Round 1 questions did not reach agreement. Key themes for revision and refinement were: stakeholder engagement throughout the process, iterative nature of the implementation process; importance of context; and importance of using guiding theories or frameworks. The process model was revised and refined based on the quantitative and qualitative data and reassessed by the experts in Round 2. Agreement was achieved on all items in Round 2 and the Delphi concluded. Additional feedback was obtained regarding terminology, target users and definition of the implementation process.ConclusionsHigh levels of agreement were attained for all sub-domains, elements, and sub-elements of the Implementation Process Model. This model will be used to develop an Implementation Support Tool to be used by healthcare providers to facilitate effective implementation and improved clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Effective stakeholder engagement: design and implementation of a clinical trial (SWOG S1415CD) to improve cancer care [J].
Barger, Sarah ;
Sullivan, Sean D. ;
Bell-Brown, Ari ;
Bott, Brad ;
Ciccarella, Anne Marie ;
Golenski, John ;
Gorman, Mark ;
Johnson, Judy ;
Kreizenbeck, Karma ;
Kurttila, Florence ;
Mason, Ginny ;
Myers, Jamie ;
Seigel, Carole ;
Wade, James L., III ;
Walia, Guneet ;
Watabayashi, Kate ;
Lyman, Gary H. ;
Ramsey, Scott D. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
[2]   Identifying opportunities for nature engagement in cancer care practice and design: protocol for four-round modified electronic Delphi [J].
Blaschke, Sarah ;
O'Callaghan, Clare C. ;
Schofield, Penelope .
BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (03)
[3]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative research in psychology, V3, P7, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[4]   A New Taxonomy for Stakeholder Engagement in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research [J].
Concannon, Thomas W. ;
Meissner, Paul ;
Grunbaum, Jo Anne ;
McElwee, Newell ;
Guise, Jeanne-Marie ;
Santa, John ;
Conway, Patrick H. ;
Daudelin, Denise ;
Morrato, Elaine H. ;
Leslie, Laurel K. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (08) :985-991
[5]   Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement [J].
Deverka, Patricia A. ;
Lavallee, Danielle C. ;
Desai, Priyanka J. ;
Esmail, Laura C. ;
Ramsey, Scott D. ;
Veenstra, David L. ;
Tunis, Sean R. .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2012, 1 (02) :181-194
[6]   Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies [J].
Diamond, Ivan R. ;
Grant, Robert C. ;
Feldman, Brian M. ;
Pencharz, Paul B. ;
Ling, Simon C. ;
Moore, Aideen M. ;
Wales, Paul W. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (04) :401-409
[7]   Context, complexity and process in the implementation of evidence-based innovation: a realist informed review [J].
Dryden-Palmer, K. D. ;
Parshuram, C. S. ;
Berta, W. B. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
[8]   Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation [J].
Durlak, Joseph A. ;
DuPre, Emily P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 41 (3-4) :327-350
[9]   A guide to knowledge translation theory [J].
Estabrooks, CA ;
Thompson, DS ;
Lovely, JJE ;
Hofmeyer, A .
JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2006, 26 (01) :25-36
[10]   A cognitive perspective on health systems integration: results of a Canadian Delphi study [J].
Evans, Jenna M. ;
Baker, G. Ross ;
Berta, Whitney ;
Barnsley, Jan .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14