Contact allergy to propolis in beekeepers

被引:20
作者
Muenstedt, K. [1 ]
Kalder, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Giessen, Univ Hosp Giessen & Marburg, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, D-35385 Giessen, Germany
[2] Univ Marburg, Univ Hosp Giessen & Marburg, Dept Gynaecol & Gynaecol Endocrinol & Oncol, D-35043 Marburg, Germany
关键词
Contact allergy; Propolis; Beekeeper; Beekeeping; BEE;
D O I
10.1016/j.aller.2009.04.005
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Allergy to propolis seems to be rare and little is known about it. Objective: The aim of the study was to survey a subset of affected beekeepers to determine aspects such as time of onset of disease, comorbidity, and possible methods of prevention. Methods: With the help of two German journals for beekeepers we contacted 41 beekeepers with propolis allergy. They were sent a questionnaire which assessed several aspects of the disease and was based on the current literature. Results: 70.7% returned our questionnaire and had clear signs of propolis allergy with positive testing by their local allergologists. They reported that allergy had developed after an average of 9.5 years beekeeping. We also found a high prevalence of other allergies (72.4%). Interestingly, there were also systemic reactions to propolis in some beekeepers but not necessarily when using propolis as a medication against other diseases. Beekeepers believed that solvents used to clean the hands could play a role in the development of the disease. Conclusion: This study provides new insights into allergy to propolis. The hypothesis that solvents used to clean the hands could play a rote in the development of the disease should be addressed in future studies. (C) 2009 SEICAP Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 301
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Bee and wasp sting reactions in current beekeepers [J].
Annila, IT ;
Karjalainen, ES ;
Annila, PA ;
Kuusisto, PA .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 77 (05) :423-427
[2]  
BOUSQUET J, 1982, ALLERGOL IMMUNOPATH, V10, P395
[3]  
Celikel S, 2006, Allergol Immunopathol (Madr), V34, P180, DOI 10.1157/13094024
[4]   The effect of occlusion on epidermal penetration of parabens from a commercial allergy test ointment, acetone and ethanol vehicles [J].
Cross, SE ;
Roberts, MS .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2000, 115 (05) :914-918
[5]  
GarciaRobaina JC, 1997, CLIN EXP ALLERGY, V27, P418, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1997.tb00727.x
[6]   Evaluation of propolis polyphenols absorption in humans by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry [J].
Gardana, Claudio ;
Simonetti, Paolo ;
Berti, Cristiana ;
Pietta, Piergiorgio .
RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2007, 21 (23) :3849-3854
[7]   Apitherapy: Usage And Experience In German Beekeepers [J].
Hellner, Markus ;
Winter, Daniel ;
von Georgi, Richard ;
Muenstedt, Karsten .
EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 5 (04) :475-479
[8]   Pulmonary tumour with high carcinoembryonic antigen titre caused by chronic propolis aspiration [J].
Lin, W-C. ;
Tseng, Y-T. ;
Chang, Y-L. ;
Lee, Y-C. .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2007, 30 (06) :1227-1230
[9]   Surveillance of suspected adverse reactions to natural health products - The case of propolis [J].
Menniti-Ippolito, Francesca ;
Mazzanti, Gabriela ;
Vitalone, Annabella ;
Firenzuoli, Fabio ;
Santuccio, Carmela .
DRUG SAFETY, 2008, 31 (05) :419-423
[10]  
Münstedt K, 2008, J INVEST ALLERG CLIN, V18, P100