Informed shared decision making in multiple sclerosis -: inevitable or impossible?

被引:39
作者
Heesen, C.
Kasper, J.
Koepke, S.
Richter, T.
Segal, J.
Muehlhauser, I.
机构
[1] INIMS, Inst Neuroimmunol & Clin Multiple Sclerosis Res, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Dept Hlth Sci, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Brent Rehabil Serv, Brent PCT, London, England
关键词
informed shared decision making; evidence-based patient information; multiple sclerosis; relapse treatment; immunotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.jns.2006.05.074
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Patients and health authorities increasingly claim active roles in health care decision making processes. As immune therapies in MS are partially effective MS is a prototypic condition for a shared decision making process. The treatment of acute relapses and the initiation, change or withdrawal of so called disease-modifying treatments are key decisions in MS management. We developed two decision aids following the phased approach of the framework of increasing evidence for complex interventions for these key decisions. In prestudies we found that 80% of MS patients demand autonomous roles in treatment decisions which contrasts with a poor knowledge of risks. On the other hand MS patients are not disturbed by evidence-based, balanced complex information. MS patients do understand this kind of information and are able to transfer new abilities to other situations. Currently we study the effects of a 4-hour education programme on relapse management versus an information leaflet in controls in 150 MS patients. In a second trial with n=298 MS patients we study the effects of an evidence-based patient information on immunotherapy on decisional role preference and performance in the patient physician encounter. Results in early 2007 will show to which extent patient education with a focus on evidence-based patient information influences participation in the decision making process. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 117
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT J MS CARE
[2]  
Bekker H, 1999, Health Technol Assess, V3, P1
[3]   Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome [J].
Bekker, HL ;
Hewison, J ;
Thornton, JG .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (03) :323-329
[4]   Effect of corticosteroids on short-term and long-term memory [J].
Brunner, R ;
Schaefer, D ;
Hess, K ;
Parzer, P ;
Resch, F ;
Schwab, S .
NEUROLOGY, 2005, 64 (02) :335-337
[5]   Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T ;
O'Brien, MA .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2005, 8 (02) :114-125
[6]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[7]   Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) :651-661
[8]   Sharing decisions with patients: Is the information good enough? [J].
Coulter, A ;
Entwistle, V ;
Gilbert, D .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 318 (7179) :318-322
[9]  
Degner L F, 1997, Can J Nurs Res, V29, P21
[10]  
*EBSIMS, MULT CTR RAND CONTR