Blood pressure variables and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes in the ADVANCE trial

被引:0
作者
Kengne, Andre-Pascal [1 ,2 ]
Czernichow, Sebastien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chalmers, John [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] George Inst Int Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Paris 13, Hop Avicenne, Dept Sante Publ, F-93430 Villetaneuse, France
来源
SANG THROMBOSE VAISSEAUX | 2010年 / 22卷 / 05期
关键词
blood pressure; type; 2; diabetes; cardiovascular event; discriminative capacity; CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE; PULSE PRESSURE; METABOLIC SYNDROME; FOLLOW-UP; MORTALITY; COMPONENTS; INFARCTION; MELLITUS; STROKE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The relative importance of different indices of blood pressure on cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes has not been established. The present study compared the relationships between different parameters of blood pressure (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], pulsed pressure [PP] and mean blood pressure [MBP], and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at 4.3 years in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron-Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. The mean age of the 11 140 participants was 65.8 (6.4) years. During follow-up, 1 000 major adverse cardiovascular events, 559 major coronary events and 468 cardiovascular deaths were registered. After adjustment for age, sex and randomisation group, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) associated with increased deviation from the standard for the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events were 1.17 (1.10 to 1.24) for SBP, 1.20 (1.13 to 1.28) for PP, 1.12 (1.05 to 1.19) for MBP, and 1.04 (0.98 to 1.11) for DBP. The areas under the ROC curve were higher for SBP and PP compared with DBP and MBP for major adverse cardiovascular events and major coronary events. When MBP was used during follow-up instead of basal blood pressure values, there was marginal improvement of the estimation of SBP, DBP and MBP, but without significant differences in areas under the ROC curve between models of SBP and those of PP. In conclusion, SBP and PP are the two best and DBP the least predictive parameters of the risk of cardiovascular events in the ADVANCE population of patients, who were relatively elderly with type 2 diabetes. However, SBP would be the simplest and most useful predictive factor in all age groups and populations.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 270
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Pulse pressure -: A predictor of long-term cardiovascular mortality in a French male population [J].
Benetos, A ;
Safar, M ;
Rudnichi, A ;
Smulyan, H ;
Richard, JL ;
Ducimetière, P ;
Guize, L .
HYPERTENSION, 1997, 30 (06) :1410-1415
[2]  
Chalmers J, 2001, DIABETOLOGIA, V44, P1118
[3]  
Chalmers J, 2001, J HYPERTENS, V19, pS21
[4]   Pulse pressure predicts cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [J].
Cockcroft, JR ;
Wilkinson, IB ;
Evans, M ;
McEwan, P ;
Peters, JR ;
Davies, S ;
Scanlon, MF ;
Currie, CJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 18 (11) :1463-1467
[5]   Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: Beyond the ROC curve [J].
Cook, Nancy R. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 54 (01) :17-23
[6]   Metabolic syndrome in relation to structure and function of large arteries:: A predominant effect of blood pressure -: A report from the SU.VI.MAX. vascular study [J].
Czernichow, S ;
Bertrais, S ;
Blacher, J ;
Oppert, JM ;
Galan, P ;
Ducimetière, P ;
Hercberg, S ;
Safar, M ;
Zureik, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 18 (09) :1154-1160
[7]   PULSATILE VERSUS STEADY COMPONENT OF BLOOD-PRESSURE - A CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS AND A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS ON CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY [J].
DARNE, B ;
GIRERD, X ;
SAFAR, M ;
CAMBIEN, F ;
GUIZE, L .
HYPERTENSION, 1989, 13 (04) :392-400
[8]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[9]   Pulse pressure and cardiovascular disease-related mortality - Follow-up study of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) [J].
Domanski, M ;
Mitchell, G ;
Pfeffer, M ;
Neaton, JD ;
Norman, J ;
Svendsen, K ;
Grimm, R ;
Cohen, J ;
Stamler, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (20) :2677-2683
[10]  
Franklin SS, 2001, CIRCULATION, V103, P1245