Evaluation of uniformity of solar illumination on the receiver of compound parabolic concentrator (CPC)

被引:37
|
作者
Ustaoglu, Abid [1 ]
Alptekin, Mustafa [2 ]
Okajima, Junnosuke [3 ]
Maruyama, Shigenao [3 ]
机构
[1] Bartin Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-74100 Bartin, Turkey
[2] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Dept Energy Syst Engn, TR-32260 Isparta, Turkey
[3] Tohoku Univ, Inst Fluid Sci, Sendai, Miyagi 9808577, Japan
关键词
Compound parabolic concentrator; Truncation; Thermal uniformity; Ray tracing;
D O I
10.1016/j.solener.2016.03.014
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Non-imaging collectors are of great interest to supply thermal energy for domestic and industrial applications at temperatures of 60-300 degrees C for their configuration of non-tracking of sun and wide range acceptance angle. In particular, cylindrical CPC with tubular absorber have attractive properties such as all side illuminating absorber and eliminating the back side heat losses. Due to steep angle at the end of reflector, CPCs tolerate truncations without any significant reduction on the performance. On the other hand, non-uniform temperature distribution around the absorber may cause undesirable temperature gradient and causes hot spot presence in which very intense solar radiation occurs. It is particularly important for solar concentrator hybrid with photovoltaic system. Non-uniform distribution of the solar irradiation on the PV cell surface results in uneven current distribution that reduces the electric output. In order to reduce the presence of hot spots on the receiver area, a cylindrical CPC was evaluated for different truncation level. The optical and thermal efficiency of the concentrator were evaluated to determine the optimum truncation levels. A detail analysis was carried out for average efficiency as function of incident angle and annual performance for different absorber surfaces such as gray and selective surface. In order to decide the uniformity of the solar illumination on the absorber, the heat flux and temperature distribution on the absorber were evaluated. The truncation was the most effective on the incident angle of 20 degrees. The peak values of the heat flux distribution were selected to see clearly the intense heat flux reduction by truncation. In the case of 50% truncation, the maximum heat flux decreases by half as the average thermal efficiency decreases only by 2%. On the other hand, the annual performance of 50% truncated CPC having selective surface increases by 5% due to the improved acceptance angle. Moreover, different absorber materials including stainless steel, aluminum and copper were considered and the temperature uniformity was evaluated for the incident angles in which the most intense heat flux occurred. The stainless steel absorber showed the maximum difference on the surface temperatures of about 3.5 K. On the other hand, for the case of the concentrator having copper absorber with 50% truncated reflector, the surface temperature was almost uniform with less component cost, and with only slight reduction on the thermal performance. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 164
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Review of the Compound Parabolic Concentrator (CPC) with a Tubular Absorber
    Jiang, Chuan
    Yu, Lei
    Yang, Song
    Li, Keke
    Wang, Jun
    Lund, Peter D.
    Zhang, Yaoming
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (03)
  • [2] A review on the recent research progress in the compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) for solar energy applications
    Tian, Meng
    Su, Yuehong
    Zheng, Hongfei
    Pei, Gang
    Li, Guiqiang
    Riffat, Saffa
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 : 1272 - 1296
  • [3] Optical Performance of Double Receiver Compound Parabolic Concentrator
    Abdullahi, B.
    Al-dadah, R. K.
    Mouhmud, S.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, ICAE2014, 2014, 61 : 2625 - 2628
  • [4] Thermal performance study of a vacuum integrated solar storage collector (ISSC) with compound parabolic concentrator (CPC)
    Messaouda, Anis
    Hazami, Majdi
    Mehdaoui, Farah
    Hamdi, Mohamed
    Noro, Marco
    Lazzarin, Renato
    Guizani, AmenAllah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2020, 44 (02) : 756 - 770
  • [5] The Performance of Solar Collector CPC (Compound Parabolic Concentrator) Type with Three Pipes Covered by Glass Tubes
    Gaos, Yogi Sirodz
    Yulianto, Muhamad
    Juarsa, Mulya
    Nurrohman
    Marzuki, Edi
    Yuliaji, Dwi
    Budiono, Kabul
    RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 1826
  • [6] Effects of deformation of cylindrical compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) on concentration characteristics
    Xu, Rongji
    Ma, Yusen
    Yan, Meiyu
    Zhang, Chao
    Xu, Shuhui
    Wang, Ruixiang
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2018, 176 : 73 - 86
  • [7] Effect of concentrated solar radiation on the accelerated degradation of poly(ethylene terephthalate) using a compound parabolic concentrator (CPC)
    Mejia, Lol-chen Alegria
    Pozos, Miriam Sanchez
    Albiter, Noel Leon
    Alvarado, Maria D. Baeza
    Uribe, Luis E. Lugo
    POLYMER BULLETIN, 2024, 81 (18) : 16575 - 16594
  • [8] Experimental study of compound parabolic concentrator with flat plate receiver
    Abd, Hareth Maher
    Alomar, Omar Rafae
    Ali, Firas Aziz
    Salih, Mothana M. Mohamed
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 166
  • [9] Optical and thermal performance of double receiver compound parabolic concentrator
    Abdullahi, B.
    AL-Dadah, R. K.
    Mahmoud, S.
    Hood, R.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 159 : 1 - 10
  • [10] Illumination uniformity issue explored via two-stage solar concentrator system based on Fresnel lens and compound flat concentrator
    Yeh, Naichia
    ENERGY, 2016, 95 : 542 - 549