Adaptive stochastic integrated assessment modeling of optimal greenhouse gas emission reductions

被引:9
作者
Shayegh, Soheil [1 ]
Thomas, Valerie M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, H Milton Stewart Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Stochastic dynamic programing; Approximate dynamic programing; Bayesian inference; Tipping point; Climate sensitivity; CATASTROPHIC CLIMATE-CHANGE; EXPERT JUDGMENTS; TIPPING POINTS; FAT TAILS; UNCERTAINTY; ECONOMICS; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-014-1300-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We develop a method for finding optimal greenhouse gas reduction rates under ongoing uncertainty and re-evaluation of climate parameters over future decades. Uncertainty about climate change includes both overall climate sensitivity and the risk of extreme tipping point events. We incorporate both types of uncertainty into a stochastic model of climate and the economy that has the objective of reducing global greenhouse gas emissions at lowest overall cost over time. Solving this problem is computationally challenging; we introduce a two-step-ahead approximate dynamic programming algorithm to solve the finite time horizon stochastic problem. The uncertainty in climate sensitivity may narrow in the future as the behavior of the climate continues to be observed and as climate science progresses. To incorporate this future knowledge, we use a Bayesian framework to update the two correlated uncertainties over time. The method is illustrated with the DICE integrated assessment model, adding in current estimates of climate sensitivity uncertainty and tipping point risk with an endogenous updating of climate sensitivity based on the occurrence of tipping point events; the method could also be applied to other integrated assessment models with different characterizations of uncertainties and risks.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Fat tails, exponents, extreme uncertainty: Simulating catastrophe in DICE [J].
Ackerman, Frank ;
Stanton, Elizabeth A. ;
Bueno, Ramon .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (08) :1657-1665
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Approximate Dynamic Programming: Solving the Curses of Dimensionality
[3]  
Cai Y, 2012, 1992674 SSRN ID
[4]  
Cai Yongyang, 2013, 18704 NAT BUR EC RES
[5]   Bounded uncertainty and climate change economics [J].
Costello, Christopher J. ;
Neubert, Michael G. ;
Polasky, Stephen A. ;
Solow, Andrew R. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (18) :8108-8110
[6]   INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELS OF CLIMATE-CHANGE - AN INCOMPLETE OVERVIEW [J].
DOWLATABADI, H .
ENERGY POLICY, 1995, 23 (4-5) :289-296
[7]  
Geist M, 2011, 2011 IEEE S AD DYN P, P9
[8]   Accounting for the risk of extreme outcomes in an integrated assessment of climate change [J].
Gerst, Michael D. ;
Howarth, Richard B. ;
Borsuk, Mark E. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (08) :4540-4548
[9]  
IPCC, 2013, 2006 IPCC GUIDELIN S
[10]   Managing uncertainty in climate change projections - Issues for impact assessment - An editorial comment [J].
Jones, RN .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2000, 45 (3-4) :403-419