Groundwater Potential Assessment Using GIS and Remote Sensing Techniques: Case Study of West Arsi Zone, Ethiopia

被引:23
作者
Kabeto, Julla [1 ]
Adeba, Dereje [1 ]
Regasa, Motuma Shiferaw [2 ]
Leta, Megersa Kebede [3 ]
机构
[1] Wollega Univ, Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Hydraul & Water Resources Engn, Nekemte 395, Oromia Region, Ethiopia
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Geophys, Dept Hydrol & Hydrodynam, PL-01452 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Univ Rostock, Fac Agr & Environm Sci, Satower Str 48,Fac Agr & Environm Sci, D-18051 Rostock, Germany
关键词
GIS; remote sensing; groundwater potential assessment; analytical hierarchy processes; weight overlay analysis; West Arsi Zone; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; LAND-USE CHANGE; INFORMATION-SYSTEM; SPATIAL-ANALYSIS; SRI-LANKA; RECHARGE; BASIN; AHP; TERRAIN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/w14121838
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Groundwater is a crucial source of water supply due to its continuous availability, reasonable natural quality, and being easily diverted directly to the poor community more cheaply and quickly. The West Arsi Zone residents remain surface water dependent due to traditional exploration of groundwater, which is a tedious approach in terms of resources and time. This study uses remote sensing data and geographic information system techniques to evaluate the groundwater potential of the study area. This technique is a fast, accurate, and feasible technique. Groundwater potential and recharge zone influencing parameters were derived from Operational Land Imager 8, digital elevation models, soil data, lithological data, and rainfall data. Borehole data were used for results validation. With spatial analysis tools, the parameters affecting groundwater potential (LULC, soil, lithology, rainfall, drainage density, lineament density, slope, and elevation) were mapped and organized. The weight of the parameters according to percent of influence on groundwater potential and recharge was determined by Analytical Hierarchy Process according to their relative influence. For weights allocated to each parameter, the consistency ratio obtained was 0.033, which is less than 0.1, showing the weight allocated to each parameter is acceptable. In the weighted overlay analysis, from a percent influence point of view, slope, land use/cover, and lithology are equally important and account for 24% each, while the soil group has the lowest percent of influence, which accounts only 2% according to this study. The generated groundwater potential map has four ranks, 2, 3, 4, and 5, in which its classes are Low, Moderate, High, and Very High, respectively, based on its groundwater potential availability rank and class. The area coverage is 9825.84 ha (0.79%), 440,726.49 ha (35.46%), 761,438.61 ha (61.27%), and 30,748.68 ha (2.47%) of the study area, respectively. Accordingly, the western part of district is expected to have very high groundwater potential. High groundwater potential is concentrated in the central and western parts whereas moderate groundwater potential distribution is dominant in the eastern part of the area. The validation result of 87.61% confirms the very good agreement among the groundwater record data and groundwater potential classes delineated.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Abdel Rahman R, 2015, THESIS U LEICESTER L
[2]  
Abubaker H.M., 2013, INT J SCI RES PUBL, V3, P2250
[3]  
Al-Abadi A., 2014, Journal of Environment and Earth Science, V4, P125
[4]   Groundwater potential assessment using GIS and remote sensing: A case study of Guna tana landscape, upper blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia [J].
Andualem, Tesfa Gebrie ;
Demeke, Girum Getachew .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2019, 24
[5]   Estimating groundwater recharge using land use and soil data: A case study in South India [J].
Anuraga, T. S. ;
Ruiz, L. ;
Kumar, M. S. Mohan ;
Sekhar, M. ;
Leijnse, A. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2006, 84 (1-2) :65-76
[6]  
Astatike K., 2011, 377 NB ANT ORG PRAG
[7]  
Astatike K., 2012, NB373 ANT ORG PRAG
[8]  
Bahuguna I.M., 2003, J. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, V31, P101, DOI [10.1007/BF03030777, DOI 10.1007/BF03030777]
[9]  
Brunelli M., 2015, Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process
[10]   INTEGRATING MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION WITH GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION-SYSTEMS [J].
CARVER, SJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1991, 5 (03) :321-339